2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2016.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Activated Carbon/Activated Carbon Asymmetric Capacitors

Abstract: Supercapacitors are energy storage devices that offer a high power density and a low energy density in comparison with batteries. Their limited energy density can be overcome by using asymmetric configuration in mass electrodes, where each electrode works within their maximum available potential window, rendering the maximum voltage output of the system. Such asymmetric capacitors are optimized using the capacitance and the potential stability limits of the electrodes, with the reliability of the design largel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[42][43][44] If mass on both electrodes did not match with each other, the potential of one electrode should firstly reach a limit to ensure charge equalization, resulting in waste in working potentials of the opposite electrode. [42,45,46] Hence, the narrowing of potential window of the negative electrode (Figure 8c) should be related to mass ratio of electrodes in RuO 2 //RuO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[42][43][44] If mass on both electrodes did not match with each other, the potential of one electrode should firstly reach a limit to ensure charge equalization, resulting in waste in working potentials of the opposite electrode. [42,45,46] Hence, the narrowing of potential window of the negative electrode (Figure 8c) should be related to mass ratio of electrodes in RuO 2 //RuO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The increase in the amount of gas adsorbed from the AC-BSOS to AC-CSOS, as seen in Figure 1, also verifies that there were specific surface area differences between AC-BSOS and AC-CSOS. Figure 1 also shows a sharp stepdown on the desorption part at p/ p 0~0 .4-0.5; therefore, it is valid to claim that the samples are mainly mesoporous and microporous and the contribution from macroporosity is very limited [9]. However, both AC-BSOS and AC-CSOS present a knee at the low adsorption pressure that indicates the pore size distribution is not narrow, and it also shows the development of some small size mesopores [33].…”
Section: Porosity Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Corresponding to the same power density variation, the reported data fall within the range of 1 to 10 Wh kg −1 with most of them dispersed in the middle to high branch of this range. 8,[50][51][52] These strongly indicate the reasonability of Equations 5 and 6 used for the calculation of the energy densities and power densities, respectively.…”
Section: Charge / MCmentioning
confidence: 85%