2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2034828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Robust State Feedback Controller for a STATCOM Using a Zero Set Concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the dynamic response curves in Fig. 10 reveals that the load bus voltage returned to the preset values of 0.986 pu following the disturbance for the STATCOM with the function of the proposed controller (EA + SDC), EA and LOC [16], respectively. It is noted that, with the proposed controller, the STATCOM reactive current (i qe ) settled towards to inductive region rapidly in a well-damped sense as compared with EA and LOC when the wind farm subjected to step load change disturbance.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A comparison of the dynamic response curves in Fig. 10 reveals that the load bus voltage returned to the preset values of 0.986 pu following the disturbance for the STATCOM with the function of the proposed controller (EA + SDC), EA and LOC [16], respectively. It is noted that, with the proposed controller, the STATCOM reactive current (i qe ) settled towards to inductive region rapidly in a well-damped sense as compared with EA and LOC when the wind farm subjected to step load change disturbance.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is best accomplished by regulating the PWM switching commands to alter the modulation index and phase angle in Equation [7.5]. Since its inception, a variety of control approaches have been proposed for STATCOM dynamic control (Schauder and Mehta, 1993;Lehn and Iravani, 1998;Rao et al ., 2000;Sahoo et al ., 2002;Wang et al ., 2002;Liu et al ., 2003;Dong et al ., 2004;Soto and Pena, 2004;El-Moursi and Sharaf, 2005;Cheng et al ., 2006;Jain et al ., 2006;Lu and Ooi, 2007;Mohagheghi et al ., 2007;Saeedifard et al ., 2007;Song et al ., 2007Song et al ., , 2009Sternberger and Jovcic, 2009;Hatano and Ise, 2010;Liu and Hsu, 2010;Spitsa et al ., 2010;Wang and Crow, 2011). The majority of approaches involve traditional linear control techniques, in which the nonlinear equations of the VSC average value model are linearized at a specifi c equilibrium (Schauder and Mehta, 1993;Lehn and Iravani, 1998;Rao et al ., 2000;Liu et al ., 2003;Dong et al ., 2004;El-Moursi and Sharaf, 2005;Cheng et al ., 2006;Saeedifard et al ., 2007;Sternberger and Jovcic, 2009;Hatano and Ise, 2010).…”
Section: © Woodhead Publishing Limited 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compensate for a change of operating conditions, a variety of controls have been reported that provide satisfactory performance over a wide range of operating conditions (Sahoo et al ., 2002;Liu et al ., 2003;Soto and Pena, 2004;Lu and Ooi, 2007;Song et al ., 2007Song et al ., , 2009Spitsa et al ., 2010;Wang and Crow, 2011). One approach is to adaptively change the gains of the PI controller in response to changes in operating condition.…”
Section: © Woodhead Publishing Limited 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a number of intelligent methods have been proposed, the PI controller advances similar to particle swarm optimization [11], neural networks [12], and artificial immunity [13]. In literature [14], [15], adaptive control and linear booming clout have been reported for their anti-external disturbance ability. In literature [16]- [17], a popular dead-beat current controller is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%