2014
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2014.921294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a new flame-containing molecular emission cavity for speciation of sulfide, sulfite, sulfate, thiosulfate and thiocyanate in wastewater: catalytic behaviour of hydrogen ion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detail of cavity ring down spectroscopy (CRDS) system is almost similar the molecular emission cavity analysis (MECA) system, described in the previous study [37]. In this experiment, some modifications are applied to the cavity in order to be used for phosphorous determination.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Detail of cavity ring down spectroscopy (CRDS) system is almost similar the molecular emission cavity analysis (MECA) system, described in the previous study [37]. In this experiment, some modifications are applied to the cavity in order to be used for phosphorous determination.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When compared to the analytical performance properties of the current VA-CPE method with those of other detection methods in literature such as LODs, linear working range, precision, preconcentration and sensitivity enhancement factors [4,5,13,14,30,32,33], except for IC method based on catalytic effect of thiosulfate onto photometric reaction between I 3 − and N 3 − at pH 5.0 [1] in Table 4, it shows many advantages such as simplicity, minimum solvent consumption, reasonable repeatability/reproducibility, a linear working range of 600-fold, a low detection limit with comparatively little interference with a highly good calibration sensitivity. IC as detection tool has disadvantages such as long analysis time (>15 min), expensive analysis equipment and chemicals, poor recovery due to peak tailing and/or peak overlapping especially at high concentrations, so as to lead to recalibration of instrument.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Va-cpe Methods With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thiosulfate determination has been mostly performed using analytical techniques such as flame-containing molecular emission cavity analysis (MECA) [30], kinetic spectrophotometry [31], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [32], flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) [33], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [34], ion-pair chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance [35], ion chromatography (IC) based on isocratic elution with fluorescence detection [36] and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [37]. Determination of thiosulfate via these methods is expensive, tedious and time-consuming as well as poor precision at low concentrations and requires expert user in her/his area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16] As a consequence, there is a growing interest in developing techniques for detecting S 2À ions, which has to be rapid, selective, and ultrasensitive. The qualitative as well as quantitative determination of S 2À can be done in a variety of ways, such as titrimetry, [17] flow-injection analysis, [18] inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, [19] hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry, [20] electrochemical methods, [21] ion chromatography, [22] HPLC, [23] chemiluminescence, [24] colorimetry, [25] molecular emission cavity analysis, [26] and fluorimetry, [27] etc. These approaches, however, have several drawbacks, such as a long detection time, a high detection cost, and difficult modification processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%