2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm1130203.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a multiplex PCR for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae to be used on sputum samples

Abstract: A multiplex PCR (mPCR) was developed for simultaneous detection of specific genes for Streptococcus pneumoniae (lytA), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (P1), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (ompA), and Haemophilus influenzae (16S rRNA, with verification PCR for P6). When the protocol was tested on 257 bacterial strains belonging to 37 different species, no false negatives and only one false positive were noted. One Streptococcus mitis out of thirty was positive for lytA. In a pilot application study of 81 sputum samples from di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PCR has previously been shown to identify a high rate of colonisation of H. influenzae in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [33], but H. influenzae was also identified in 22% by BAL culture and 37% by BAL mPCR in 27 patients who had never smoked. As mPCR has shown a high analytical specificity for H. influenzae [12], and as sputum mPCR was positive for H. influenzae in only two (7.7%) out of 26 CAP patients with definite aetiologies other than H. influenzae in the present authors' previous study [13], the high rate of H. influenzae in the present study probably represents colonisation. Hence, it would be interesting to test mPCR on BAL samples from another LRTI population and another control population with a lower smoking frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…PCR has previously been shown to identify a high rate of colonisation of H. influenzae in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [33], but H. influenzae was also identified in 22% by BAL culture and 37% by BAL mPCR in 27 patients who had never smoked. As mPCR has shown a high analytical specificity for H. influenzae [12], and as sputum mPCR was positive for H. influenzae in only two (7.7%) out of 26 CAP patients with definite aetiologies other than H. influenzae in the present authors' previous study [13], the high rate of H. influenzae in the present study probably represents colonisation. Hence, it would be interesting to test mPCR on BAL samples from another LRTI population and another control population with a lower smoking frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…By serial dilution of bacterial strains, the detection levels of the mPCR have been shown to be 10 2 cfu?mL -1 of sample for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, and 10 3 genome copies or inclusion-forming units per millilitre of sample for M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae [12].…”
Section: Multiplex Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aim of the present study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of respiratory culture and a single-run multiplex PCR (mPCR) for specific genes of Streptococcus pneumoniae (lytA), Haemophilus influenzae (16S rRNA, with verification by PCR for P6), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (P1), and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (ompA) (12) applied to respiratory samples in CAP patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%