2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515)
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2003.1352597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
200
0

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as a bolus over 1 min by a computer-controlled pump (Harvard Apparatus), and emission data were collected for 120 min. Dynamic list-mode scan data were reconstructed into 33 frames (6 × 30 s, 3 × 1 min, 2 × 2 min, and 22 × 5 min) with all corrections (i.e., attenuation, normalization, randoms, scatter, deadtime, and motion) using the ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM)-based MOLAR algorithm (60). The final reconstructed image resolution was ∼3 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as a bolus over 1 min by a computer-controlled pump (Harvard Apparatus), and emission data were collected for 120 min. Dynamic list-mode scan data were reconstructed into 33 frames (6 × 30 s, 3 × 1 min, 2 × 2 min, and 22 × 5 min) with all corrections (i.e., attenuation, normalization, randoms, scatter, deadtime, and motion) using the ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM)-based MOLAR algorithm (60). The final reconstructed image resolution was ∼3 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic PET imaging data were reconstructed with corrections for attenuation, normalization, scatter, randoms, deadtime, and motion employing the MOLAR algorithm (Carson et al, 2003) with a frame timing of 6 × 30 s; 3 × 1 min; 2 × 2 min; and 22 × 5 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listmode dynamic scan data were collected and reconstructed (reconstructed image resolution B3 mm) with all corrections (randoms, scatter, dead time, attenuation, normalization, and motion) by the MOLAR algorithm. 20 In addition to the event-by-event motion correction performed during the reconstruction, software motion correction was also performed by registering each frame to an early summed image (0 to 10 minutes) using FLIRT (FSL 3.2, Analysis Group, FMRIB, Oxford, UK).…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomography Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%