2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2011.6152665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DesigN Of A Monolithic Multi-Channel Front-End Readout ASIC for LYSO/SiPM-based small- animal flat-panel PET imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DNL and INL in the present study—in the ranges −0.32 to 0.33 and −0.43 to 0.37, respectively—are better than those in two other designs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The resolution of the ADC, 10 b, is better than that in two other designs [ 12 , 13 ]. The ENOB, 9.24 b, is better than that in one other design [ 12 ].…”
Section: Measurement Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The DNL and INL in the present study—in the ranges −0.32 to 0.33 and −0.43 to 0.37, respectively—are better than those in two other designs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The resolution of the ADC, 10 b, is better than that in two other designs [ 12 , 13 ]. The ENOB, 9.24 b, is better than that in one other design [ 12 ].…”
Section: Measurement Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The nonlinearity of the conversion curve, 1.8%, is smaller than that in two other designs [ 11 , 23 ] and close to that in another [ 13 ]. The sampling rate per channel, 1 MS/s, is better than that in two other designs [ 12 , 23 ] and the same as that in another [ 13 ]. The DNL and INL in the present study—in the ranges −0.32 to 0.33 and −0.43 to 0.37, respectively—are better than those in two other designs [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations