1972
DOI: 10.1115/1.3426544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Force Feedback Chatter Control System

Abstract: The analysis of machine tool chatter from frequency domain considerations is generally accepted as a valid representation of the regenerative chatter phenomenon. However, active control of regenerative chatter is still in its embryonic stage. It was established in reference [2] that a measurement of the cutting force could be effectively used in conjunction with a controller and a tool position servo system to increase the stability of an engine lathe and to improve its transient response. This paper presents … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active vibration control strategies have also been applied for chatter control. Glaser et al (1979) and Nachtigal (1972) propose a feedforward strategy of using the cutting force signal for chatter control in turning. An adaptive control technique, using a filtered-X least mean square algorithm has been proposed by Browning, Golioto, and Thompson (1997) for chatter suppression in boring bars.…”
Section: Application Of Active Damping For Chatter Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active vibration control strategies have also been applied for chatter control. Glaser et al (1979) and Nachtigal (1972) propose a feedforward strategy of using the cutting force signal for chatter control in turning. An adaptive control technique, using a filtered-X least mean square algorithm has been proposed by Browning, Golioto, and Thompson (1997) for chatter suppression in boring bars.…”
Section: Application Of Active Damping For Chatter Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active solutions can overcome these limitations and it is why they have been extensively studied. These active systems are roughly based on measuring the vibration and generating a force response that attempts to reduce the effect of the chatter, by means of a sensor-actuator pair placed near the tool [15] [16] [18] [20] [21] [23] or on the machine structure [14][17] [19] [22], which guarantees adaptability to changing conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redmond et al (1999), Browning et al (1997), and Nayfeh (1997, 1999) concluded that biaxial control is necessary to ensure satisfactory chatter suppression. Nachtigal (1972) proposed a feed-forward approach for control of chatter in the lathe and Glaser and Nachtigal (1979) extended it to boring operations. Shiraishi et al (1991) implemented an optimal control strategy to mitigate chatter in turning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%