2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iros40897.2019.8968037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a 3-DOF Linkage-Driven Underactuated Finger for Multiple Grasping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, robotic grippers are classified as classical rigid grippers and soft grippers (Birglen & Schlicht, 2018; Shintake et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2023; Zhang et al, 2020). The rigid gripper/hands are classified further into two main categories: wire driven, and linkage‐driven (ACAR et al, 2021; Cianciotto et al, 2021; Do et al, 2023; Kang, Seo, Yoon, et al, 2019; Kashef et al, 2020; Ko, 2020; Nate et al, 2022; Yoon & Choi, 2021). From an actuation point of view in rigid grippers, there are two major types of grippers: fully actuated (Hermann et al, 2019; Mańkowski et al, 2020) and under‐actuated gripper (Courchesne et al, 2023; Glick et al, 2020; Kang et al, 2021; Mouazé & Birglen, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, robotic grippers are classified as classical rigid grippers and soft grippers (Birglen & Schlicht, 2018; Shintake et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2023; Zhang et al, 2020). The rigid gripper/hands are classified further into two main categories: wire driven, and linkage‐driven (ACAR et al, 2021; Cianciotto et al, 2021; Do et al, 2023; Kang, Seo, Yoon, et al, 2019; Kashef et al, 2020; Ko, 2020; Nate et al, 2022; Yoon & Choi, 2021). From an actuation point of view in rigid grippers, there are two major types of grippers: fully actuated (Hermann et al, 2019; Mańkowski et al, 2020) and under‐actuated gripper (Courchesne et al, 2023; Glick et al, 2020; Kang et al, 2021; Mouazé & Birglen, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional robotic hands usually consist of rigid parts and rigid joints, which have low compliance and lack the ability to adapt to unstructured environments [3,4]. In addition, many conventional gripper ends are made of rigid materials and are in rigid contact with the object to be gripped, which requires that the object to be gripped is not fragile and deformable, which greatly limits the versatility and flexibility of a robotic gripper [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on mechanical elements used in the power transmission system, underactuated robotic hands/grippers can be classified into three main types as follows: the wire-driven type [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], the linkage-driven type [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the gear-driven type [35][36][37][38][39], and some combinations [40][41][42]. The wire-driven type has advantages of compact size, light weight, and good shape-adaptive properties when encompassing the object to be grasped.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a certain range of input torque and object sizes, a balance of design stiffness and preloading of the torsion spring should be considered to maximize the stable power-grasping region [43]. In our previous study [27], a functional robotic finger prototype was designed intuitively without investigating the grasping behavior of the final design. The development of this finger prototype is primarily based on a specific CAD-aided simulation and lacks a systematic framework for its designing and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%