2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of 3D printable concrete based on the relationship between flowability of cement paste and optimum aggregate content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the GCs are classified in th same workability class (flow: F4, slump: S5). There are some differences in the classifica tion of CC with the two methods and this is noted in the literature [37][38][39].…”
Section: Workabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the GCs are classified in th same workability class (flow: F4, slump: S5). There are some differences in the classifica tion of CC with the two methods and this is noted in the literature [37][38][39].…”
Section: Workabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 displays the particle size distribution of the river sand used in the present work. According to the convenient method for evaluating the changes in workability and buildability with time intervals [29], as illustrated in Figure 1, mortar specimens prepared with S/B = 0.5 and S/B = 1.7 fail to satisfy the requirement of printability due to the poor buildability and workability, respectively. Based on trial-and-error optimization, when 0.8 ≤ S/B ≤ 1.4, the prepared mortar could be used for printing and mortar mixes with S/B = 0.8, 1.1, and 1.4 were selected to evaluate the dynamic properties of 3DPCM.…”
Section: Experimental Process 21 Preparation Of Printable Mortarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pashias and Zhang proposed the slump test that is a widespread method for testing concrete and mortar can be applied to evaluate the buildability of 3DPC. The buildability of 3DPC can be observed using the remaining height of the slumped concrete under the action of gravity, since in the test the force of gravity is also the driver while flow resistance is defined according to yield stress (Pashias et al 1996;Tay et al 2019;Zhang et al 2019).The slump test they proposed is the same principle as the cohesion test in the paper, the difference is only the tool used. The other method was evaluated from the number of printed layers and the deformation of paste in a limited time.…”
Section: Buildable Performance Testmentioning
confidence: 99%