Volume 4: 12th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle and Tire Technologies; 4th International Conference on Micro- And N 2010
DOI: 10.1115/detc2010-28004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Methodology of Heavy Truck Front Underride Protection Devices (FUPD)

Abstract: The Objective of this study is to explain a new methodology in the design of heavy vehicle front underride protection devices (FUPD). This methodology is targeted generating optimal solutions in a cost-effective manner. In this research project non-linear finite element models were created using LS DYNA FEA package to perform crash simulations between a small car and the front of the truck at various levels, starting from component model level and ending with full tractor-semitrailer model level. Comparison be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tractor portion of the colliding body is represented as Volvo VNL frame members constrained at positions aft of the axle. This component level simplification provides an effective and accurate alternative to evaluating FUPD performance in comparison with the computationally expensive full tractor-trailer finite element models [6]. The tractor frame height variation has been selected in two increments, measured from the ground to be in the 600-650 mm and 720-770 mm ranges as described by the tractor inventory survey performed by VC-Compat observing manufacturers such as Volvo and Mercedes-Benz [8].…”
Section: Model Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tractor portion of the colliding body is represented as Volvo VNL frame members constrained at positions aft of the axle. This component level simplification provides an effective and accurate alternative to evaluating FUPD performance in comparison with the computationally expensive full tractor-trailer finite element models [6]. The tractor frame height variation has been selected in two increments, measured from the ground to be in the 600-650 mm and 720-770 mm ranges as described by the tractor inventory survey performed by VC-Compat observing manufacturers such as Volvo and Mercedes-Benz [8].…”
Section: Model Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%