Several centrifuge and full-scale tests have demonstrated that an impression pile provides increased geotechnical capacity of up to 40% compared to a straight shafted pile depending on the quality of the indentations. The feasibility of creating indentations is governed by the strength of the clay, the capacity of the jack used in the impression tool, the impression shape and the area being impressed. Model tests and limit analyses have been carried out to optimise the impression tool. Results show that a flat-end or a flat-conical tip represents the best compromise between the need to reduce bearing capacity of the tip whilst maximising the indentation depth. Indentations must be spaced by at least 3 times their width to ensure a well-constructed impression pile with independent indentations.