2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, manufacture and test of a low-cost solar cooker with high-performance light-concentrating lens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a discount rate of 6% and the lifetime of a novel mixed cooker is 10 years, with no salvage value (S) at the end of the useful life, are assumed. The annual operation and maintenance cost, which varies up to 5% of the capital cost, is considered a Parabolic trough solar thermal cooker 700 El Moussaoui et al 18 Concentrating solar cooker 365 Coccia et al 60 developed new solar cooker 250 variable factor for a given device. Using Equation ( 40), 57 the LCCM can be calculated.…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a discount rate of 6% and the lifetime of a novel mixed cooker is 10 years, with no salvage value (S) at the end of the useful life, are assumed. The annual operation and maintenance cost, which varies up to 5% of the capital cost, is considered a Parabolic trough solar thermal cooker 700 El Moussaoui et al 18 Concentrating solar cooker 365 Coccia et al 60 developed new solar cooker 250 variable factor for a given device. Using Equation ( 40), 57 the LCCM can be calculated.…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the reports of tested solar cookers shows that the linear regression expressing the relationship of the cooker power versus the temperature difference between load and ambient has a negative slope [12,17,18,19], but the determined linear regression shown in some reports has an opposite trend as it is the case of GoSun Sizzle cooker [19] and the box solar cooker tested by Sethi et al [20]. The same positive slope would be achieved if the peanut oil test ended at a load temperature of 95 ºC with the box solar cooker of Coccia et al [3].…”
Section: Linear Regression For Evaluating the Performance Parameters ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The box cooker was able to cook most kinds of food with an overall utilization efficiency of 26.7%. Recently, a SC with a high-performance light-concentrating lens was tested [32]. Overall efficiencies were found to be from 7 to 11% when silicone oil was the load and from 11 to 26% when water was the load.…”
Section: Solar Cooker and Dryer: Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%