2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design (In)tensions in mathematics curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Principles to guide the design of materials to this end include the need for materials to be more explicit particularly with respect to subject specific i.e., mathematical demands and rationales for these. At the same time calls for greater transparency point to 'design tensions' in curriculum materials (Dietiker & Riling, 2018), and the need for "balance": between "adequate support and too much, and … between prescription and teacher autonomy" (Davis et al, 2017, p. 302).…”
Section: The Teacher-resources Relationship and Transparency Of Materials Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principles to guide the design of materials to this end include the need for materials to be more explicit particularly with respect to subject specific i.e., mathematical demands and rationales for these. At the same time calls for greater transparency point to 'design tensions' in curriculum materials (Dietiker & Riling, 2018), and the need for "balance": between "adequate support and too much, and … between prescription and teacher autonomy" (Davis et al, 2017, p. 302).…”
Section: The Teacher-resources Relationship and Transparency Of Materials Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers’ approaches to supplementation tend to be stable, but they are not immutable. Dietiker and Riling (2018) found that professional guidance can alter how teachers enact official curriculum, even if the guidance is simply from the official teacher guide. Understanding this, Sawyer et al (2019) called for developing teachers’ “critical curation” abilities, and Hu and Torphy (2020) delineated between teachers’ “thick” (purposeful and human-led) and “thin” (inscrutable and algorithm-led) supplement curation, arguing that both teachers’ and search algorithms’ curation must be improved to realize the full potential of virtual resource pools.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%