Design in Informal Economies: Craft Neighborhoods in Istanbul

Abstract

IntroductionThe modes of production in informal economies in developing countries are highly dependent on social relationships, including apprenticeship and vocational training. 3 As a result, different design processes can be expected to emerge in informal economies. Such contexts can require a different understanding of artistry, "objecthood," labor, and time. Some designers in clustered craft contexts in Istanbul, a representative of informal economies in the world, develop strategies and embed their design knowledge in new processes in ways that are not addressed in "modernist" design education.The aim of this paper is to present how the encounter of designers and craftsmen 4 can create a genuine blend of practice that particularly stems from dialogical bonds as a new "designing" typology in informal contexts. Such bonds and the practices they engender simultaneously empower designers and local craftsmen, such as goldsmiths, stone setters, neon sign makers, inlayers, coppersmiths, and welders, in urban Istanbul neighborhoods.To explore these new processes, we undertook in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 14 trained professional designers and the master craftsmen who work with them in Istanbul. In this article we selected significantly representative excerpts from these interviews to illustrate how craftsmen and designers coax each other to be open and alert for opportunities that arise during the collaborative production or design process. The research also aims to understand the effects of the unplanned exposure of the traditional culture of "crafts" and the culture of "design" to one another in a context of non-Western modernity.

Pivot 2020: Designing a World of Many Centers

“…"The building blocks of success" for the enterprise is supported by the value of friendships, family relations, and voluntary activities in the neighbours (Turner, 2003;Malasan, 2017). This condition is in line with the study by Kaya & Yagiz (2011) who explain that the characteristics of the craft clusters in various developing countries are highly dependent on the social relationship, which might shape different design activities that frequently are being neglected in the modern' design practice…”

Empowerment or Disempowerment: The (Dis)empowering Processes and Outcomes of Co-Designing with Rural Craftspeople

“…Lastly, empowerment discussion should consider the dichotomy between in situ and ex situ, endogeneity, and exogeneity. Case 1 validates the significance of situation-based actions for promoting instantaneous co-operation drawing on the clustering of local resources and capabilities [48], hence the capacity building and job prospects for locals. The ex situ conducting of Case 2 in the urban environment also exhibits advantages, such as access to making facilities and larger networks of potential actors for Hua Yao development.…”

Women entrepreneurs in the craft industry: a case study of the batik industry during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Bell et al (2018) suggest that craft workers are entrepreneurial due to their emphasis on adaptability, flexibility and imagination. Often they are entrepreneurial with support from technology or other individuals but the emphasis is on individual handmade objects (Kaya and Yagız, 2011). This means there is a high degree of individuality in each product made that differentiates them from mass made products (Adamson, 2018).…”