2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design in biology and rational design in vaccinology: A conceptual analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these observations and considerations bring serious doubts about the overall applicability of the rational structural vaccinology computational methods. These concerns are further elaborated and enhanced by an important fact that when the proteins interact, they often undergo mutual adaptation and induced fit/folding [36,[110][111][112], indicating that epitopes and paratopes are fuzzy binding sites devoid of clear-cut structural boundaries [113]. As a result, the structures of the binding sites in the unbound molecules may dramatically differ from the static structures of antigen-Ab complexes used in the rational structural vaccinology [113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: Fight Fire With Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these observations and considerations bring serious doubts about the overall applicability of the rational structural vaccinology computational methods. These concerns are further elaborated and enhanced by an important fact that when the proteins interact, they often undergo mutual adaptation and induced fit/folding [36,[110][111][112], indicating that epitopes and paratopes are fuzzy binding sites devoid of clear-cut structural boundaries [113]. As a result, the structures of the binding sites in the unbound molecules may dramatically differ from the static structures of antigen-Ab complexes used in the rational structural vaccinology [113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: Fight Fire With Firementioning
confidence: 99%