2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design improvement and performance evaluation of solar photocatalytic reactor for industrial effluent treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some literature the product of k r and k a was considered as the apparent rate constant and the unit is in time −1 . For example, the apparent rate constant for the MB degradation in a solar photocatalytic reactor with TiO 2 suspended in water was reported as 0.035/h, while in this paper it is 4.55/h. The apparent rate constant for a spinning disc reactor with immobilized TiO 2 was reported as 0.0003/s, while in this paper it was 0.0013/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some literature the product of k r and k a was considered as the apparent rate constant and the unit is in time −1 . For example, the apparent rate constant for the MB degradation in a solar photocatalytic reactor with TiO 2 suspended in water was reported as 0.035/h, while in this paper it is 4.55/h. The apparent rate constant for a spinning disc reactor with immobilized TiO 2 was reported as 0.0003/s, while in this paper it was 0.0013/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Reported AOP reactors are all different in design and size, and, therefore, it is difficult to make exact comparisons. Each reactor design has its own advantages and disadvantages; for example, some are easy to build and others are designed to use natural sunlight . Table shows the photonic efficiency data of the MB degradation obtained with different photocatalytic reactors found in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the performance of PWTRs, solid criteria are necessary. Evaluating a PWTR should focus primarily on efficiency, throughput, energy consumption, and equipment cost [174]. Currently, the commonly used criteria include reaction rate constant, specific removal rate, photon absorption efficiency, overall photonic efficiency, space time yield, and photocatalytic spatial and typical yields, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Evaluation Methods For Pwtrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising method that provides energy that is friendly to the environment is photocatalysis. [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%