2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.jatis.4.1.011214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, implementation, and performance of the Astro-H SXS calorimeter array and anticoincidence detector

Abstract: The calorimeter array of the JAXA Astro-H (renamed Hitomi) soft x-ray spectrometer (SXS) was designed to provide unprecedented spectral resolution of spatially extended cosmic x-ray sources and of all cosmic x-ray sources in the Fe-K band around 6 keV, enabling essential plasma diagnostics. The SXS had a square array of 36 x-ray calorimeters at the focal plane. These calorimeters consisted of ion-implanted silicon thermistors and HgTe thermalizing x-ray absorbers. These devices demonstrated a resolution of bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absorber thickness and area were chosen to provide near-unity stopping power to energies of ≈6 keV and as high a filling fraction as was practical given the assembly constraints. 6 The QE of each absorber as a function of incident x-ray energy can be described using QEðEÞ ¼ 1 − exp½−μ HgTe ðEÞΣ, where μ HgTe ðEÞ is the mass absorption coefficient for HgTe and Σ is the areal density. The absorption coefficients for Hg and Te are known; assuming nominal stoichiometry of 1:1 we in turn know μ HgTe ðEÞ for the absorbers, using μ HgTe ðEÞ ¼ ½m Hg μ Hg ðEÞ þ m Te μ Te ðEÞ∕ðm Hg þ m Te Þ, where m Hg and m Te are the atomic masses and μ Hg ðEÞ and μ Te ðEÞ are the mass absorption coefficients from the literature.…”
Section: Detector Quantum Efficiency and Filling Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The absorber thickness and area were chosen to provide near-unity stopping power to energies of ≈6 keV and as high a filling fraction as was practical given the assembly constraints. 6 The QE of each absorber as a function of incident x-ray energy can be described using QEðEÞ ¼ 1 − exp½−μ HgTe ðEÞΣ, where μ HgTe ðEÞ is the mass absorption coefficient for HgTe and Σ is the areal density. The absorption coefficients for Hg and Te are known; assuming nominal stoichiometry of 1:1 we in turn know μ HgTe ðEÞ for the absorbers, using μ HgTe ðEÞ ¼ ½m Hg μ Hg ðEÞ þ m Te μ Te ðEÞ∕ðm Hg þ m Te Þ, where m Hg and m Te are the atomic masses and μ Hg ðEÞ and μ Te ðEÞ are the mass absorption coefficients from the literature.…”
Section: Detector Quantum Efficiency and Filling Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of the anti-coincidence detector appears in the Astro-E2 instrument paper 46 and the changes made to the anti-co readout for Astro-H are reported in Ref. 6. Additional detail about the SXS anti-co, including a schematic of the detector array and anti-co plus the events observed in both due to the in-orbit particle background, may be found in Ref.…”
Section: Anti-coincidence Detector Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-ray events were then recorded both from external sources and an on-board Fe-55 calibration source. The detector resolution for all pixels was eventually verified to be the same as before launch, ~4.9 eV 17,18,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The number of wirebonds is undecided, and this simulation assumes N bonds = 100. Their thermal conductance and geometrical parameters are set from measurements of a single gold wirebond performed at NASA Goddard [5]. Finally, the model makes use of a so-called 'muntin approximation'; in the COMSOL simulation, we do not account for the full complexity of the muntin structure, which is computationally prohibitive.…”
Section: Comsol Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%