2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2003.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design formalism for collaborative assembly design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other limitations include material properties and the requirements of inspection, accessibility, repair, portability, and recyclability (Kim et al, 2004). Defining joining components provides a way of realizing simpler forms of the individual components of products, which affect assembly cost and environmental impacts related to assembly and disassembly operations.…”
Section: Focus Area 2: Assembly/disassembly Operation Modeling and Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other limitations include material properties and the requirements of inspection, accessibility, repair, portability, and recyclability (Kim et al, 2004). Defining joining components provides a way of realizing simpler forms of the individual components of products, which affect assembly cost and environmental impacts related to assembly and disassembly operations.…”
Section: Focus Area 2: Assembly/disassembly Operation Modeling and Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of complex assemblies with hundreds to thousands of parts, adding the amount of complementary data defining such a behavioral model becomes too tedious. Recent approaches [25] reduce the description of junctions between components to global parameters describing bolted and riveted connections without referring to the individual surfaces of each bolt or rivet. This fits well with a design process but simulation objectives may require a detailed representation of interfaces when the purpose is to assess the stress field distribution in a bolted connection with tens or hundreds of bolts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the number of the combinatorial sequences it is possible to follow two ways. The first, adopted in many studies (Kim et al, 2004;Roy and Bharadwaj, 2002;Liu and Nnaji, 1991;Whitney et al, 1999), is based on the direct lecture of the drawing and the creation of the liaison graph with the aid of the users. Along this way is easy to observe that, for the previous example, the obtained liaison graph is that one shown in Figure 3 and the number of the assembly sequences, as reported in Table I, is reduced to 12.…”
Section: Assembly Liaisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%