2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for safety implementation among design professionals in construction: The context of Palestine

Abstract: Design for safety (DfS), also known as prevention through design, is a prominent means for tackling work-related illnesses and injuries in construction. However, the available DfS studies in construction have paid very limited attention to developing countries. Consequently, there is limited insight into DfS implementation in many developing countries including Palestine. This study therefore investigates DfS implementation among design professionals in the Palestinian construction industry. A questionnaire su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire items were adopted/adapted from previous DfS studies (Manu et al, 2018(Manu et al, , 2019Abueisheh et al, 2020) to suit the context of this study.…”
Section: Design Of Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire items were adopted/adapted from previous DfS studies (Manu et al, 2018(Manu et al, , 2019Abueisheh et al, 2020) to suit the context of this study.…”
Section: Design Of Survey Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, Manu et al (2018Manu et al ( , 2019 call for research that will advance the understanding of the critical success factors and barriers to the implementation of PtD in DCs. Subsequent studies from Labo-Popoola et al (2019) and Abueisheh et al (2020) that address these factors provide valuable insight but from the positivist perspective. Furthermore, while these studies have contributed toward advancing and establishing the understanding of the subject in the region, the missing interpretivism and constructivism perspective has implications for gaining an in-depth understanding of PtD in DCs.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationale For The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, while the current research contributes to the discourse from the qualitative research perspective, it will also adopt a multi-designer perspective as against the aforesaid studies in the area in Nigeria which mainly focused on one category of designer, Architects or Civil Engineers, with the exception of the study by Abueisheh et al (2020) which surveyed both. A qualitative inquiry into PtD in the Nigerian construction context will provide more insight and explain a lot in the extant findings of previous PtD studies in the country and other DCs.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationale For The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…design task, OSH assessment of a design) (Behm et al, 2014;Goh and Chua, 2016;Edirisinghe et al, 2016;Manu et al, 2018), insensitive to workers' exposure to safety hazards (Sacks et al, 2015) and the lack of knowledge and understanding on the roles and responsibilities of designers in addressing the OSH issues during the design phase (Gangolells et al, 2010;Morrow et al, 2015). The lack of prevention-based education at the tertiary level often leads to inadequacy in embracing the knowledge of the concept (Popov et al, 2013;L opez-Arquillos et al, 2015;Abueisheh et al, 2020). On the other hand, limited availability of PtD-related tools, guidelines and techniques has hindered the designers to enhance their skills to practice this concept during design (Jin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%