2008
DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2007.913190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design-for-Manufacture for Multigate Oxide CMOS Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These combinations have a triple-gate oxide and it is not manufacturing friendly due to an additional mask penalty, between +1 mask for the gate oxide process only, and up to +8 masks for the case V t and SDE implants also need to be separated. In addition, the complexity of having an oxide-strip at a very small window, the additional thermal budget, and the fact that there are two different gates with a close thickness target are problematic due to the oxidation kinetics [25]. However, it was successfully developed for 28 nm technology, having gate oxides thickness of 16A for Low Power Standby (1.1 V) and 13.5 A for Low Power (0.8 V) [26].…”
Section: Leakage Reduction In Transistor Level-cmos and Srammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These combinations have a triple-gate oxide and it is not manufacturing friendly due to an additional mask penalty, between +1 mask for the gate oxide process only, and up to +8 masks for the case V t and SDE implants also need to be separated. In addition, the complexity of having an oxide-strip at a very small window, the additional thermal budget, and the fact that there are two different gates with a close thickness target are problematic due to the oxidation kinetics [25]. However, it was successfully developed for 28 nm technology, having gate oxides thickness of 16A for Low Power Standby (1.1 V) and 13.5 A for Low Power (0.8 V) [26].…”
Section: Leakage Reduction In Transistor Level-cmos and Srammentioning
confidence: 99%