2018
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2018.1492899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for improving pedestrian wind comfort: a case study on a courtyard around a tall building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard K-epsilon (k-ε) turbulence model with two-scale wall functions is used to provide closure. Two-scale wall functions are devised to fit a fluid's boundary layer profile relative to the main flow's properties (Serteser and Karadağ, 2018):When the fluid mass centers of the near-wall mesh cells are located inside the boundary layer, the physical fluid flow boundary layer is thick.When the fluid mass centers of the near-wall mesh cells are located outside the boundary layer, the physical fluid flow boundary layer is thin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard K-epsilon (k-ε) turbulence model with two-scale wall functions is used to provide closure. Two-scale wall functions are devised to fit a fluid's boundary layer profile relative to the main flow's properties (Serteser and Karadağ, 2018):When the fluid mass centers of the near-wall mesh cells are located inside the boundary layer, the physical fluid flow boundary layer is thick.When the fluid mass centers of the near-wall mesh cells are located outside the boundary layer, the physical fluid flow boundary layer is thin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large computational model needs to be created, and different zones with respect to aerodynamic roughness lengths should be arranged. For instance, in the wind comfort study [6], the nearby area around the analyzed tall building is modeled explicitly (zone 2), and the far field containing an urban area with tall buildings is implicitly modeled (zone 3) using aerodynamic roughness length of y0 = 2 m (Figure 1a). While the whole domain area is 1400 m by 2600 m, the area with explicitly modeled buildings was 400 m by 400 m. An upstream domain extension of 5H and a downstream domain extension of 15H were left in the domain as advised in the guidelines [4].…”
Section: Methodology For the Assessment Of Wind Energy Potential In Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the process of urban development and expansion, the building density, size and geometry are changing dramatically, especially in the megacities such as Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), China. Buildings can block the atmospheric flow, altering the wind direction and velocity, which in turns significantly affect the pedestrian level wind comfort in the building surroundings (Du and Mak 2017;Serteser and Karadag 2018;Li and Chen 2020). To satisfy the needs of urban residents in high-level living standards, more comfortable and safer wind environment are required in the high dense cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%