Design for Disassembly of Concrete Slabs with Mortar Joints

Abstract

A sustainable future is required for precast concrete structures, and the reuse of concrete elements will be an essential part of the solution. Design for disassembly is currently conducted with costly and time-consuming mechanical joints. Now, mortar joints with much weaker mortar types are proposed for new buildings, enabling easier disassembly by new methods: removal by direct pulling and removal by use of a system of flat jacks. Different weak mortar types were tested in the lab to achieve the properties required to check the transfer of wind loads and the level of resistance to separation during disassembly. Using a modelled case study building, the results showed that weak lime cement-based mortars had the required properties to substitute regular cement-based mortar in joints between slabs and a stabilising wall during a critical wind load. Regarding disassembly, pulling concrete slabs out with a mobile crane would be possible if hydro demolition systems could be implemented to remove parts of the mortar joint beforehand. Using a system of flat jacks to push the slab apart showed that the method’s weakness was the punching failure of the thin wall to the hollow cores. Solutions were proposed to overcome the challenge.

Systematic Mapping of Circular Economy in Structural Engineering

“…Furthermore, the diagram shows that the majority of the publications are Technical Papers on DfD. The publications in this area typically focus on conducting technical assessments, verification, and performing calculations for structural elements and connections designed for easy disassembly for future reuse [25,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. A plausible reason for this trend could be that it addresses a clear problem with easily accessible technical solutions, which enables significant advancements in the field without requiring extensive adjustments to current design practices.…”

“…CT: [103], SC: [15,86,[104][105][106] CT: [29,33] CE: [21][22][23][24]69,72,77,81,82], SC: [19] SC: [17,25,28,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] Case Studies Design Development Framework Review Technical Paper CT = Computational Tool, CD = Computational Design, SC = Structural Concept, CE = Circular Economy Investigation.…”