2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for additive manufacturing: Framework and methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(176 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal AM processes are relatively slow and expensive, but new types of machinery allow additive fabrication of metal-bonded abrasive diamond tools even on a production scale amounting to hundreds of thousands pcs/month [ 88 ]. The knowledge of the optimal process parameters for the fabrication of polyamide or metal matrix composites along with Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) tools and techniques [ 105 ] can be a key issue for wider implementation of AM in the production of grinding tools. Apart from the achievable dimensions of some features such as thin walls or holes [ 37 , 92 ], an effective control of the tool porosity and its micro-structure are the main advantages of AM processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal AM processes are relatively slow and expensive, but new types of machinery allow additive fabrication of metal-bonded abrasive diamond tools even on a production scale amounting to hundreds of thousands pcs/month [ 88 ]. The knowledge of the optimal process parameters for the fabrication of polyamide or metal matrix composites along with Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) tools and techniques [ 105 ] can be a key issue for wider implementation of AM in the production of grinding tools. Apart from the achievable dimensions of some features such as thin walls or holes [ 37 , 92 ], an effective control of the tool porosity and its micro-structure are the main advantages of AM processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second step, this information must also be encoded in a machine-readable manner. The deficiency of (structured) knowledge on Design for Additive Manufacturing (DFAM) has been recognized as one of the obstacles that hinders wider acceptance of AM in industry [23]. A way to formally define knowledge is to employ ontologies, which is discussed below.…”
Section: A Design Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the main cost driver in additive manufacturing is part volume rather than part complexity. However, to take advantage of this novelty, design, production, and verification of AM products still need a significant improvement [1,2,3,4]. Complex geometries, material-process interaction, and internal features are the issues concerning part representation and limiting the current geometric dimensioning and tolerancing/geometric product specification practices [4].…”
Section: Specifications and Verification For Additive Manufacturing Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (2), in N SN q assumes only two possible values s a and s m . This justifies choosing the value 2 as an exponent of the logarithm in (3).…”
Section: Proposed Approach To the Verification Of The Compatibility Of Vmgt And Vrmomentioning
confidence: 99%