Design Features for Improving Mobile Health Intervention User Engagement: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis

Abstract

Background Well-designed mobile health (mHealth) interventions support a positive user experience; however, a high rate of disengagement has been reported as a common concern regarding mHealth interventions. To address this issue, it is necessary to summarize the design features that improve user engagement based on research over the past 10 years, during which time the popularity of mHealth interventions has rapidly increased due to the use of smartphones. Objective The aim of this review was to answer the question “Which design features improve user engagement with mHealth interventions?” by summarizing published literature with the purpose of guiding the design of future mHealth interventions. Methods This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid EMBASE, and Ovid PsycINFO, were searched for English and Chinese language papers published from January 2009 to June 2019. Thematic analysis was undertaken to assess the design features in eligible studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess study quality. Results A total of 35 articles were included. The investigated mHealth interventions were mainly used in unhealthy lifestyle (n=17) and chronic disease (n=10) prevention programs. Mobile phone apps (n=24) were the most common delivery method. Qualitative (n=22) and mixed methods (n=9) designs were widely represented. We identified the following 7 themes that influenced user engagement: personalization (n=29), reinforcement (n=23), communication (n=20), navigation (n=17), credibility (n=16), message presentation (n=16), and interface aesthetics (n=7). A checklist was developed that contained these 7 design features and 29 corresponding specific implementations derived from the studies. Conclusions This systematic review and thematic synthesis identified useful design features that make an mHealth intervention more user friendly. We generated a checklist with evidence-based items to enable developers to use our findings easily. Future evaluations should use more robust quantitative approaches to elucidate the relationships between design features and user engagement.

Implementation of Online Hospitals and Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Medical Services in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

“…In addition, because of their traditional medical thinking, some patients have misunderstandings that lead them to believe that online hospitals are not reliable. Whether mobile medical services can be popularized and applied has become the focus of current research [ 4 , 5 ]. In order to explore patients’ willingness to use mobile medical services and their influencing factors, this study examines Chinese patients’ perspectives of online hospitals and builds a model of their willingness to use these services, based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.…”

The ideal mHealth-application for rheumatoid arthritis: qualitative findings from stakeholder focus groups

“…However, most available apps do not meet these criteria [ 17 ] and care models based on these applications have to date only sparsely been introduced in practice [ 18 ]. Moreover, previous studies have raised concerns about user disengagement with mHealth-applications, illustrating the need to study ideal app-content to optimise compliance [ 19 ]. Finally, the opinions of stakeholders other than patients, such as nurses and rheumatologists, have received little attention in mHealth-literature.…”

From Precision Metapharmacology to Patient Empowerment: Delivery of Self-Care Practices for Epilepsy, Pain, Depression and Cancer Using Digital Health Technologies

“…Cybersecurity risks for mobile apps connected to the internet and networks are addressed by data encryption, authentication, code integrity, identification of vulnerabilities, and abilities to detect cybersecurity events. Another real-life challenge is patient adherence to digital interventions which may vary depending on type of delivered modalities ( Baumel et al, 2019 ), and can be improved by personalization and gamification ( Litvin et al, 2020 ; Wei et al, 2020 ). While digital interventions are considered as non-invasive and relatively low-risk for patients, the safety of mobile medical apps has not been systemically studied.…”