AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-2090
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Factors for Two-Dimensional, External-Compression Supersonic Inlets

Abstract: Geometric and aerodynamic design factors were studied for the design of two-dimensional, external-compression inlets operating at a freestream Mach number of Mach 1.7. Computational simulations of the inlet flows were performed to obtain the inlet performance metrics consisting of the inlet flow rates, total pressure recovery, and total pressure distortion at the engine face. The key design factors identified included the external diffuser Mach number, cowl lip interior angle, bleed slot length, throat section… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aspects can significantly impact the overall intake performance, and flow behavior can vary depending on the intake's characteristics. Several studies have explored design optimization [45][46][47], while others have investigated how various intake configurations perform at off-design conditions or how different flow control methods can be used to prevent flow unsteadiness. These studies share a common goal: to widen the operational range and increase the efficiency of high-speed intakes.…”
Section: Physics and Characterization Of Intake Buzzmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These aspects can significantly impact the overall intake performance, and flow behavior can vary depending on the intake's characteristics. Several studies have explored design optimization [45][46][47], while others have investigated how various intake configurations perform at off-design conditions or how different flow control methods can be used to prevent flow unsteadiness. These studies share a common goal: to widen the operational range and increase the efficiency of high-speed intakes.…”
Section: Physics and Characterization Of Intake Buzzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a small cowl deflection, the shock can be weakened, and the flow separation suppressed, possibly improving intake performance [52]. The design optimization of the cowl lip is more commonly investigated in steady flows, and any alterations can notably influence cowl drag, mass-capture, heat loads, and total pressure recovery [9,46,47,[53][54][55][56]. While Fisher [33] discussed various oscillation amplitudes with varying cowl lip positions during intake buzz, Shi et al [57] described the buzz evolution process influenced by the translation of the cowl.…”
Section: Physics and Characterization Of Intake Buzzmentioning
confidence: 99%