2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijiscm.2008.026711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design decisions in workflow management and quality of work

Abstract: In this paper, the design and implementation of a workflow management (WFM) system in a large Dutch social insurance organisation is described. The effect of workflow design decisions on the quality of work is explored theoretically and empirically, using the model of Zur Mühlen as a frame of reference. It was found among a total sample of 66 employees that there was no change in the experience of work quality before and after the introduction of the WFM system. There are however, significant differences in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WFM systems are specifically designed to automate work and processes, by steering and determine the activities to perform. This inevitably will have influence on the quality of work (De Waal and Batenburg, 2008;Holden et al, 2011;Morris and Venkatesh, 2010;Ngai et al, 2005;Poelmans, 2002;Wilkin, 2007;WilsonEvered and Härtel, 2009;Zur Muehlen, 2004). For these reasons we focus on how user satisfaction has an impact on one's perceived quality of work, not IS/IT use.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WFM systems are specifically designed to automate work and processes, by steering and determine the activities to perform. This inevitably will have influence on the quality of work (De Waal and Batenburg, 2008;Holden et al, 2011;Morris and Venkatesh, 2010;Ngai et al, 2005;Poelmans, 2002;Wilkin, 2007;WilsonEvered and Härtel, 2009;Zur Muehlen, 2004). For these reasons we focus on how user satisfaction has an impact on one's perceived quality of work, not IS/IT use.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%