2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-011-0327-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design decisions in interactive geometry software

Abstract: Software design is increasingly being recognized as an important factor in student learning when interacting with interactive geometry software (IGS). A categorization of the operations possible within an IGS is used to identify and analyse design decisions made in a number of current IGS programs: Cabri II Plus, Cabri 3D, Cinderella, GeoGebra and Geometer's Sketchpad. The analysis, in the context of exploring the area of a circle, is focused on construction, dragging, and alternative spatial and semantic view… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the many varieties of dynamic geometry software, convergence towards mature common standards remains limited (Mackrell 2011). However a major European project, Intergeo, has sought to facilitate exchange and use of dynamic geometry resources by teachers through creating an online repository with the potential to enrich the readily available range of tried and tested dynamic tasks (Kortenkamp and Laborde 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the many varieties of dynamic geometry software, convergence towards mature common standards remains limited (Mackrell 2011). However a major European project, Intergeo, has sought to facilitate exchange and use of dynamic geometry resources by teachers through creating an online repository with the potential to enrich the readily available range of tried and tested dynamic tasks (Kortenkamp and Laborde 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them, including Sketchpad and Cabri, are still available, but it has become difficult for independent developers or companies to maintain or launch alternative DGEs. Mackrell (2011) discusses the matter of design decisions for interactive geometry software comparing Cabri, Sketch-pad, Cinderella (Richter-Gebert & Kortenkamp 2012) and GeoGebra, and shows that a certain variety of approaches is desirable. She also highlights the fact that consistent educational design of a DGE is difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Digital Technologies For Geometry Teaching and Learning Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trends for digital geometry tools include (1) how geometry on the web is encountering various technological difficulties associated with the need to replace Java; (2) the issue of interface design and how users interact with onscreen geometry (Jackiw & Sinclair, 2009;Kortenkamp & Dohrmann, 2010;Laborde & Laborde, 2014;Mackrell 2011;Schimpf & Spannagel, 2011; (3) the rise of mobile devices and touch technology; and (4) new modes of interaction such as multi-touch and multi-collaboration.…”
Section: The Role Of Digital Technologies In Geometry Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%