1992
DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(92)90044-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design criteria for an active biogas plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, for a required production rate of biogas, the period to achieve the optimum temperature should be reduced. Tiwari et al (1992) have suggested heating of the slurry by a heat exanger connected to a flat plate collector. Gupta et al (1998), Sodha et al (1987Sodha et al ( , 1989, Tiwari et al (1997) have suggested installation of PVC greenhouse type structure over a biogas plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, for a required production rate of biogas, the period to achieve the optimum temperature should be reduced. Tiwari et al (1992) have suggested heating of the slurry by a heat exanger connected to a flat plate collector. Gupta et al (1998), Sodha et al (1987Sodha et al ( , 1989, Tiwari et al (1997) have suggested installation of PVC greenhouse type structure over a biogas plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, either floating or fixed dome type biogas plant has been considered. On the basis of their finding, it has been concluded that active heating of slurry in digester is more effective in comparison with other heating methods [12][13][14][15]. The temperature of slurry can be increased upto optimum level (~ 37 o C) by optimizing the area of flat plate collector for a given capacity of the slurry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Integration of flat plate collector to digester through heat exchanger inside slurry, generally referred as active heating [12][13][14][15]. In their study, either floating or fixed dome type biogas plant has been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%