1996
DOI: 10.1109/10.503177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design criteria for active shielding of inhomogeneous magnetic fields for biomagnetic applications

Abstract: General analytical expressions for the field attenuation and the reaction factor for a spherical active compensated cabin are theoretically derived. The shielding effect of various materials and their thickness on external magnetic disturbances as well as the retroactive effect on the locally generated compensating fields of the compensating coils are then analyzed. A numerical evaluation of the analytical expressions developed is made and directives for practical measures are derived. Comparison with the expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This extends the work of Ref. 23 from spherical to cylindrical geometries; for the spherical case, we demonstrate agreement with Ref. 23 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This extends the work of Ref. 23 from spherical to cylindrical geometries; for the spherical case, we demonstrate agreement with Ref. 23 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, as mentioned above, these authors considered only uniform applied fields. Urankar and Oppelt 23 analyzed the general multipole field (both as an external and internal source) for single spherical shields, and provided general shielding and reaction factors. They employed their the results to analyze active magnetic compensation used in conjunction with magnetically shielded rooms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P n (u) is the Legendre function of degree n and the term in square braces, known as the reaction factor [8,10], quantifies the extent to which the n-th term in the field expansion is augmented by the presence of the shield. An important consequence of the reaction factor, discussed further below, is that the homogeneity of the field of a spherical coil may either improve or degrade inside a shield depending on the ratio a/b [8].…”
Section: The Spherical Coil Inside a Spherical Shieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For closed objects, such as spherical shells [26,27], the shielding factor approaches infinity as µ → ∞, and | µ The simulations differed slightly in their results, dependent on whether OPERA or FEMM was used, and whether the solenoidal coil or loop coil were used. Based on the simulations, the result is | µ Bs dBs dµ | = 0.42 − 0.50 for the solenoidal coil, with the lower value being given by FEMM and the upper value being given by a 3D OPERA simulation, for identical geometries.…”
Section: Geometry Correction and Determination Of µ(T )mentioning
confidence: 99%