2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, construction, and validation of an MRI-compatible vibrotactile stimulator intended for clinical use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For segmentation with the ANIMAL algorithm we use the nonlinear registration parameters previously validated [Chakravarty, b] and evaluated against other nonlinear registration methods [Chakravarty, ]. Briefly, this method involves a linear registration followed by a nonlinear registration focused on a region‐of‐interest limited predominantly to the subcortical structures and other noncortical anatomical structures (such as the corpus callosum and lateral ventricles) to help guide the nonlinear transformation estimation process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For segmentation with the ANIMAL algorithm we use the nonlinear registration parameters previously validated [Chakravarty, b] and evaluated against other nonlinear registration methods [Chakravarty, ]. Briefly, this method involves a linear registration followed by a nonlinear registration focused on a region‐of‐interest limited predominantly to the subcortical structures and other noncortical anatomical structures (such as the corpus callosum and lateral ventricles) to help guide the nonlinear transformation estimation process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atlas was then customized to the unique neuroanatomy of the subjects being studied using a region-of-interest non-linear registration estimation approach (Chakravarty et al, 2008, 2009b) that has been validated against manually defined gold-standards, intra-operative recordings, and brain activations recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (Chakravarty et al, 2008, 2009a,b). All linear and non-linear transformations were estimated using the ANIMAL algorithm (Collins et al, 1994, 1995; Collins and Evans, 1997), which is part of the MINC suite of medical image processing tools 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thalamic activations of vibrotactile stimuli have only been reported in a few awake human studies (Chakravarty et al, 2009a, b; Li Hegner et al, 2007) but are not generally detected in anesthetized animal models. For example, a PET study in awake humans showed that passive finger movement activated only the contralateral S1 and S2, whereas active finger movement activated the contralateral M, SMA, bilateral S2, and premotor cortex, in addition to the contralateral S1 (Mima et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%