2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2013.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design considerations of polymeric nanoparticle micelles for chemotherapeutic delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPCbased polymers are thought to possess improved antifouling properties (Lewis 2000) in comparison to PEG-based polymers due to the greater level of hydration reported for MPC, circa 23 water molecules per MPC unit (Goda et al 2006;Morisaku et al 2008), in contrast to circa 3 per PEG unit (Maxfield and Shepherd 1975;Shikata et al 2006). The premise of these biomimetic NIDS being the ability to avoid reticuloendothelial system (RES) clearance (Gref et al 1994), more so if within the 30-100 nm particle diameter size range (Garcia et al 2014), and thus attain sufficiently long systemic circulatory times such that they can harness the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (Maeda 2001) in order accumulate at tumour sites due to the abnormally leaky vasculature (Takakura et al 1998;Ho and Shoichet 2013). In the case of pH-responsive MPC-DPA (Ma et al 2003;Salvage et al 2005), the PNM would then release the therapeutic cargo in response to the lowered pH environment found in endosomes (Sharma and Sharma 1997) and tumour tissue (Liu et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPCbased polymers are thought to possess improved antifouling properties (Lewis 2000) in comparison to PEG-based polymers due to the greater level of hydration reported for MPC, circa 23 water molecules per MPC unit (Goda et al 2006;Morisaku et al 2008), in contrast to circa 3 per PEG unit (Maxfield and Shepherd 1975;Shikata et al 2006). The premise of these biomimetic NIDS being the ability to avoid reticuloendothelial system (RES) clearance (Gref et al 1994), more so if within the 30-100 nm particle diameter size range (Garcia et al 2014), and thus attain sufficiently long systemic circulatory times such that they can harness the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (Maeda 2001) in order accumulate at tumour sites due to the abnormally leaky vasculature (Takakura et al 1998;Ho and Shoichet 2013). In the case of pH-responsive MPC-DPA (Ma et al 2003;Salvage et al 2005), the PNM would then release the therapeutic cargo in response to the lowered pH environment found in endosomes (Sharma and Sharma 1997) and tumour tissue (Liu et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple synthetic and natural biodegradable polymers may be used in antitumor drug delivery systems, such as polyesters (e.g., polylactic acid, PLA), polyamino acids (e.g., polyaspartic acid), and polyoxypropylenes (e.g., poloxamers) [ 233 ].…”
Section: Nanotechnology-based Drug Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric micelles have a core-shell structure where the hydrophobic core can load hydrophobic drugs, and the hydrophilic shell introduces colloidal stability and stealth properties to the nanocarrier 7,8 . Important physicochemical characteristics of polymeric micellar formulations affecting their biological destination is the size of this drug carrier [9][10][11][12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%