2015
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2015.2416774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Considerations for an Electromagnetic Railgun Firing Intelligent Bursts to Be Used Against Antiship Missiles

Abstract: Railguns can reach higher muzzle velocities and fire rates than conventional guns. Muzzle velocities up to 2400 m/s and fire rates of more than 50 Hz have already been demonstrated with projectiles having a mass of 140 g and a square caliber of 25 mm. We investigated if a close-in weapon system (CIWS) based on a railgun performs better against incoming antiship missiles than a conventional CIWS such as the goalkeeper and propose solutions to optimize the performance of such a railgun. CIWSs are operational sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research on the electrodynamic accelerators (EA), commonly called railguns, concern mainly military applications and exploration of the space [1][2][3][4]. However, more and more studies are related to their applications in industry or measuring systems, like the impact testing of some materials [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on the electrodynamic accelerators (EA), commonly called railguns, concern mainly military applications and exploration of the space [1][2][3][4]. However, more and more studies are related to their applications in industry or measuring systems, like the impact testing of some materials [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in rail accelerators is increasing, especially in military applications [1][2][3]. However, there is also an increasing interest observed in other applications, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second scenario is air-defense, where projectiles with a relatively low weight are fired in rapid succession as last line of defense against anti-ship missiles or approaching aircrafts. For existing close-in weapon systems (CIWS), like 'Phalanx" or 'Goalkeeper', typical velocities are below 1500 m/s, while a railgun should be able to perform better [7]. No matter what the final application will look like, the size and the weight of the PPS is the key for a mobile application of the weapon system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%