Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909125106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and x-ray crystal structures of high-potency nonsteroidal glucocorticoid agonists exploiting a novel binding site on the receptor

Abstract: Crystallography and computer modeling have been used to exploit a previously unexplored channel in the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Highly potent, nonsteroidal indazole amides showing excellent complementarity to the channel were designed with the assistance of the computational technique AlleGrow. The accuracy of the design process was demonstrated through crystallographic structural determination of the GR ligand-binding domain-agonist complex of the D-prolinamide derivative 11. The utility of the channel w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therapeutic opportunities, away from the classic ligand-binding pocket, are being explored. Indeed, X-ray crystal structure determination of an indazole amide variant functioning as a non-steroidal GR modulator, confirmed the existence and occupation of a predicted "meta" channel in the GR LBD [82]. This offers additional possibilities for novel GR ligand design.…”
Section: Impact Of Protein Surface Modulators?mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Therapeutic opportunities, away from the classic ligand-binding pocket, are being explored. Indeed, X-ray crystal structure determination of an indazole amide variant functioning as a non-steroidal GR modulator, confirmed the existence and occupation of a predicted "meta" channel in the GR LBD [82]. This offers additional possibilities for novel GR ligand design.…”
Section: Impact Of Protein Surface Modulators?mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Selective GR modulators (SEGRMs) differ from GCs in the way that upon binding to GR they trigger transrepression, but do not initiate transactivation. and modelling revealed a second binding site within the ligand-binding pocket of GR (Biggadike et al, 2009). Also the crystal structure of GR-LBD bound with compound 10, which retains full transrepression with a partial transactivation ability, shows a new binding mode, clearly different from the classic GC binding model (Carson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Structure Of Glucocorticoid Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An important lesson in this regard has been our change in understanding the dynamic nature of the steroid-receptor binding pocket. We have seen examples of extensive induced fits for amongst others the glucocorticoid receptor which is able to bind ligands beyond the conventional confines of its binding pocket whilst remaining in an agonistic conformation (Biggadike et al, 2009;Madauss et al, 2008;Suino-Powell et al, 2008). The pocket, behind the crucial helix-3 and helix-5 binding residues, Gln570 and Arg611, is normally water filled.…”
Section: Other Structure-based Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has already been demonstrated to be a viable ligand-binding region with the potential to improve ligand potency. An interesting note regarding the exploration of the pocket is that GSK report difficulty in combining the use of this pocket with the maintenance of partial agonism (Biggadike et al, 2009). PR has been shown to adapt to steroids baring bulky 17 groups (Madauss et al, 2004) and Trp741 in AR adapts to different ligands, adopting a new position to open an additional channel in the receptor .…”
Section: Other Structure-based Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%