Design and Validation of the Bright Internet

Lee, Jae Kyu; Cho, Daegon; Lim, Gyoo Gun

doi:10.17705/1jais.00484

Cited by 17 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The requirements, principles, and features constitute actionable guidelines, which highlights a core difference between our work and the extant research. Thereby, we reflect the various calls in the IS literature to support the development of implementable tools to increase security and privacy, especially in the IoT (Bélanger & Crossler, 2011;Lee et al, 2018;Medaglia & Serbanati, 2010;Pavlou, 2011).…”

Section: Sdps Design Theorymentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The constantly growing pool of smart, connected IoT devices poses completely new challenges regarding security and privacy (Lee et al, 2018;Sicari et al, 2015;Weber, 2010). Companies are increasingly moving towards cloud solutions and sharing sensor data in multi-party ecosystems (Anderson et al, 2017;Lowry et al, 2017).…”

Section: Security and Privacy In The Internet Of Thingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A second challenge in the realm of IoT sensor data is privacy (Lee et al, 2018;Sicari et al, 2015). More specifically, there is a lack of well-established privacypreserving mechanisms (Bélanger & Crossler, 2011).…”

Section: Dr1: Enable Tamper-resistant Data Generation Processing Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent years, new forms of information technology (e.g., sensors and mobile devices) have dramatically expanded what can be measured and analyzed, thereby posing completely new challenges regarding security and privacy (Lee, Cho, & Lim, 2018;Newell & Marabelli, 2015;Sicari, Rizzardi, Grieco, & Coen-Porisini, 2015;Weber, 2010). The potential for information systems (IS)-related security and privacy issues to affect customers in their daily lives and private spheres makes these challenges top business priorities (Sicari et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

"Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-Preserving Protection of Sensor Data"

Chanson¹,

Bogner²,

Bilgeri³

et al. 2019

JAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A constantly growing pool of smart, connected Internet of Things (IoT) devices poses completely new challenges for business regarding security and privacy. In fact, the widespread adoption of smart products might depend on the ability of organizations to offer systems that ensure adequate sensor data integrity while guaranteeing sufficient user privacy. In light of these challenges, previous research indicates that blockchain technology may be a promising means to mitigate issues of data security arising in the IoT. Building upon the existing body of knowledge, we propose a design theory, including requirements, design principles, and features, for a blockchain-based sensor data protection system (SDPS) that leverages data certification. We then design and develop an instantiation of an SDPS (CertifiCar) in three iterative cycles that prevents the fraudulent manipulation of car mileage data. Furthermore, we provide an ex-post evaluation of our design theory considering CertifiCar and two additional use cases in the realm of pharmaceutical supply chains and energy microgrids. The evaluation results suggest that the proposed design ensures the tamper-resistant gathering, processing, and exchange of IoT sensor data in a privacy-preserving, scalable, and efficient manner.

show abstract

Section: Sdps Design Theorymentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Security and Privacy In The Internet Of Thingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dr1: Enable Tamper-resistant Data Generation Processing Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

"Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-Preserving Protection of Sensor Data"

Chanson¹,

Bogner²,

Bilgeri³

et al. 2019

JAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this paper, we investigate potential measures which can be effective in increasing firms' awareness of cyber security and internalizing the externalities to develop more secure cyber environments. This study also echoes the origin 3 responsibility principle of the research framework of the Bright ICT initiative [9,10] by proposing a new security vulnerability index to incentivize firms to behave as good citizens and take a proactive approach to prevent the widespread use of undesirable content over the Internet [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 67%

Information Disclosure and Security Vulnerability Awareness: A Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment in Pan-Asia

Zhuang

Choi

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates how the disclosure of a security vulnerability index based on outgoing spams and phishing website hosting, which may serve as an indicator of a firm's inadequate security controls, affects companies' security protection strategy. Our core objective is to study whether firms improve their security when they become aware of their vulnerabilities and such information is publicized. To achieve this goal, we conduct a randomized field experiment on 1,262 firms in six Pan-Asian countries and regions. For the treatment group of 631 firms, we alert them of their security vulnerability index and ranking over time, and their relative performance compared to their peers via emails and a public advisory website. Compared with the control group without being informed of their security vulnerability index, the treatment group improved their security over time, with a significant reduction of outgoing spam volume. A marginally significant improvement in reducing phishing hosting websites is also observed among non-web hosting firms in the treatment group. The security improvement may be attributed to firms' proactive reaction to the security vulnerability information. Our study provides cybersecurity policy makers with useful insights on how to motivate firms to adopt better security measures.

show abstract

Design Principles Exposition: A Framework for Problematizing Knowledge and Practice in DSR

Hansen

Haj-Bolouri

2020

Designing for Digital Transformation. Co-Creating Services With Citizens and Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design principles (DPs) have been recognized as a central contribution in Design Science Research and the research community has begun acknowledging their importance. Much of this work implicitly assumes that design principles are natural components of contributions that can easily be derived by researchers without a need for criteria for their proposal, application or evaluation. In this paper we infer a framework for how to expose the conceptual structure of DPs as both components and sole contributions. We find a danger in assuming that design principles alone are contributions as they are very broadly used to propose utility yet the specific target audience or the explicit use of them as components of design theory occur less frequent. Furthermore, by applying our framework to a set of DPs, we offer four parts of their conceptual structure that can be used to convey the nature of design principle contributions and further identify potential areas for improvement or further research. We derive 8 questions that offer a guiding hand to researchers who attempt to embed DPs as components of their contribution either to research or to practice.

show abstract

Design and Validation of the Bright Internet

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

"Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-Preserving Protection of Sensor Data"

"Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-Preserving Protection of Sensor Data"

Information Disclosure and Security Vulnerability Awareness: A Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment in Pan-Asia

Design Principles Exposition: A Framework for Problematizing Knowledge and Practice in DSR

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About