2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5124816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Validation of a Novel Cable-Driven Hyper-Redundant Robot Based on Decoupled Joints

Abstract: In most of the prior designs of conventional cable-driven hyper-redundant robots, the multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) bending motion usually has bending coupling effects. It means that the rotation output of each DOF is controlled by multiple pairs of cable inputs. The bending coupling effect will increase the complexity of the driving mechanism and the risk of slack in the driving cables. To address these problems, a novel 2-DOF decoupled joint is proposed by adjusting the axes distribution of the universal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Due to its accuracy and ease of position control, the study is focused on cable-driven actuators to regulate the movement. [15][16][17][18][19][20] In contrast, pneumatic actuation has some limitations and challenges because it cannot provide feedback for accurate movement, is more difficult to control, and is less portable, making it potentially challenging to directly control robot motion using deformation. 10 Hysteresis effects, restricted strain recovery, and control of shape changes are additional challenges that may arise when using shape memory alloys for soft actuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Due to its accuracy and ease of position control, the study is focused on cable-driven actuators to regulate the movement. [15][16][17][18][19][20] In contrast, pneumatic actuation has some limitations and challenges because it cannot provide feedback for accurate movement, is more difficult to control, and is less portable, making it potentially challenging to directly control robot motion using deformation. 10 Hysteresis effects, restricted strain recovery, and control of shape changes are additional challenges that may arise when using shape memory alloys for soft actuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical modules include scissor mechanisms (Bai et al, 2013;Sun et al, 2014) and singleloop mechanisms such as Bennett mechanisms (Chen and You, 2008;Song et al, 2017), Mycard mechanisms (Liu and Chen, 2009), Bricard mechanisms (Lee, 1996), Sarrus-like mechanisms (Chen et al, 2013;Lu et al, 2016), and also include origami patterns such as the Miura-ori pattern (Gattas et al, 2013), the waterbomb pattern (Lee et al, 2021), the Resch pattern (Yang et al, 2022), and the cuboid-twist pattern (Hull, 2014). These modules are usually connected by sharing links or kinematic pairs (Soykasap et al, 2004;Huang et al, 2021a;Zhao et al, 2009;Tian et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venkiteswaran et al presented the static model based on the pseudo-rigid body model, which is suitable for the non-constant curvature curved motion of the continuum robot [ 29 ]. However, these methods are established based on the material constitutive model, which cannot be directly applied to the snake-arm robot with discrete joints [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%