2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and synthesis of zeolitic tetrazolate-imidazolate frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is challenging to liquefy metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) because these materials typically decompose upon heating, even in an inert atmosphere, before they melt. However, the liquid state of MOFs is of highest interest, as it allows molding and shaping of these functional porous materials and the generation of MOF glasses by quenching the MOF melt below its glass transition temperature ( T g ). , MOF glasses have been classified as the 4th generation of MOFs as they possess the potential to address some of the key challenges in materials development for applications in gas separation, solid electrolytes, battery materials, and many more. However, out of the enormous number of crystalline MOF structures reported so far, only a very few derivatives have been shown to melt and form a porous glass after melt-quenching. Among these are some derivatives of the subfamily of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs). ,, ZIFs typically are crystalline materials constructed from M 2+ cations (e.g., Zn 2+ or Co 2+ ), which are tetrahedrally coordinated by imidazolate-type linkers, forming network topologies similar to zeolites and silicates. The rather high thermal stability of some ZIFs, predominantly a consequence of the relatively high thermal stability of imidazolate-type linkers, is a key feature for accessing their liquid and glassy states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging to liquefy metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) because these materials typically decompose upon heating, even in an inert atmosphere, before they melt. However, the liquid state of MOFs is of highest interest, as it allows molding and shaping of these functional porous materials and the generation of MOF glasses by quenching the MOF melt below its glass transition temperature ( T g ). , MOF glasses have been classified as the 4th generation of MOFs as they possess the potential to address some of the key challenges in materials development for applications in gas separation, solid electrolytes, battery materials, and many more. However, out of the enormous number of crystalline MOF structures reported so far, only a very few derivatives have been shown to melt and form a porous glass after melt-quenching. Among these are some derivatives of the subfamily of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs). ,, ZIFs typically are crystalline materials constructed from M 2+ cations (e.g., Zn 2+ or Co 2+ ), which are tetrahedrally coordinated by imidazolate-type linkers, forming network topologies similar to zeolites and silicates. The rather high thermal stability of some ZIFs, predominantly a consequence of the relatively high thermal stability of imidazolate-type linkers, is a key feature for accessing their liquid and glassy states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural arrangement and bonding between the mtz linker and Zn(II) metal center in the SOD topology are the most stable of all N-donor ligands. 50 These two properties of ZTF-8 prevent it from acid/base/H 2 O attacks and achieve superior stability relative to all ZIFs and ZTFs reported so far. S12, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Surprisingly, all acid- and base-treated samples maintained their original crystal structure, as evidenced by their unshifted PXRD profiles in comparison to the parent framework (Figures S10 and S11, Supporting Information). The structural arrangement and bonding between the mtz linker and Zn­(II) metal center in the SOD topology are the most stable of all N-donor ligands . These two properties of ZTF-8 prevent it from acid/base/H 2 O attacks and achieve superior stability relative to all ZIFs and ZTFs reported so far.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the stability and colloidal stability of ZIF‐7 under biological conditions remain an important challenge. Moreover, 5‐FU is a water‐soluble hydrophilic acidic drug, whereas ZIFs are less stable in water, acid solutions and phosphate ion [14] . Consequently, ZIF decomposition and early drug release are inevitable in the circulation [15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%