2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and synthesis of cyclic disulfide-bonded antibacterial peptides on the basis of the α helical domain of Tenecin 1, an insect defensin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of their constrained geometries, cyclic peptides often generate more bioactive compounds with prolonged biological activity. Nevertheless, this is not always the case because cyclization limits structural flexibility and might occasionally fail to retain activity . While cyclization is a simple approach to improving stability and enhancing bioactivity, cyclization might prevent peptides from achieving bioactive conformations or could lead to more selective antimicrobial analogues. , HDPs are well known to have complex multimodal mechanisms of action including altering cytoplasmic and outer membrane permeability and inhibiting cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, enzymatic activities, etc. ,, IDR-1018 is a unique multifunctional molecule with not only direct (moderate) antibacterial activity, but also the ability to suppress biofilm formation and to induce the dissolution of mature biofilms . Previous studies showed a favorable activity of IDR-1018 toward bacterial biofilms because of its ability to bind the second-messenger nucleotide (p)­ppGpp and stimulate its degradation in stressed cells within 30 min. , This nucleotide is part of the stringent stress response in bacteria and essential in biofilm development .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of their constrained geometries, cyclic peptides often generate more bioactive compounds with prolonged biological activity. Nevertheless, this is not always the case because cyclization limits structural flexibility and might occasionally fail to retain activity . While cyclization is a simple approach to improving stability and enhancing bioactivity, cyclization might prevent peptides from achieving bioactive conformations or could lead to more selective antimicrobial analogues. , HDPs are well known to have complex multimodal mechanisms of action including altering cytoplasmic and outer membrane permeability and inhibiting cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, enzymatic activities, etc. ,, IDR-1018 is a unique multifunctional molecule with not only direct (moderate) antibacterial activity, but also the ability to suppress biofilm formation and to induce the dissolution of mature biofilms . Previous studies showed a favorable activity of IDR-1018 toward bacterial biofilms because of its ability to bind the second-messenger nucleotide (p)­ppGpp and stimulate its degradation in stressed cells within 30 min. , This nucleotide is part of the stringent stress response in bacteria and essential in biofilm development .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 While cyclization is a simple approach to improving stability and enhancing bioactivity, cyclization might prevent peptides from achieving bioactive conformations or could lead to more selective antimicrobial analogues. 26,27 HDPs are well known to have complex multimodal mechanisms of action including altering cytoplasmic and outer membrane permeability and inhibiting cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, enzymatic activities, etc. 4,28,29 IDR-1018 is a unique multifunctional molecule with not only direct (moderate) antibacterial activity, but also the ability to suppress biofilm formation and to induce the dissolution of mature biofilms.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, chemical approaches to cyclic homodetic (cyclization through an amide bond) or heterodetic (cyclization through a non‐amide bond) head‐to‐tail, head/tail‐to‐side chain, side chain‐to‐side chain peptides (Figure ) have deserved special attention from peptide chemists (Davies, ; Lambert, Mitchell, & Roberts, ; Martí‐Centelles, Pandey, Burguete, & Luis, ; Tam & Wong, ; White & Yudin, ). One classical route is oxidation of thiol groups to produce a disulfide bridge between the side chains of Cys residues, which may either belong or be added to the original sequence; this is relatively simple from a synthetic viewpoint if only one disulfide bridge is to be formed (Ahn et al, ), but can be laborious if multiple disulfide bridges are targeted, although improved methods have been emerging over the past 15 years (e.g., Cheneval et al, ; Vila‐Perelló, Sánchez‐Vallet, García‐Olmedo, Molina, & Andreu, ). One limitation of disulfide‐bridged peptides is their lability to bioreducing conditions (Yang, Chen, Vlahov, Cheng, & Low, ), which has often led researchers to invest on homodetic cyclic peptides, given the higher chemical and biochemical stability of amide bonds (Monaim et al, ; Rohrbacher, Deniau, Luther, & Bode, ; Valldosera et al, ).…”
Section: Peptides As Drugs: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21] It is also a common approach to improve protease stability of peptides. [22][23][24] Therefore, we cyclized IL8RP-LoopsE to improve its properties. IL8RP-LoopsQ was cyclized as a control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclization leads to a more rigid structure and reduces the entropic penalty as the peptide binds to its target protein and thereby lowers the free binding energy 18–21 . It is also a common approach to improve protease stability of peptides 22–24 . Therefore, we cyclized IL8RP‐LoopsE to improve its properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%