2008
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200800047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Synthesis of Aryl Ether Inhibitors of the Bacillus Anthracis Enoyl‐ACP Reductase

Abstract: The problem of increasing bacterial resistance to the current generation of antibiotics is well documented. This includes such pathogens as methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the potential for developing drug–resistant pathogens for use as bioweapons, such as Bacillus anthracis. The biphenyl ether, antibacterial triclosan exhibits broad–spectrum activity and provides a potential scaffold for the development of new, broad–spectrum antibiotics targeting the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway, via inhib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All residues interacting with the diphenyl ether inhibitors are located in three distinct regions (Figure 3), which exhibit substantial flexibility prior to cofactor and inhibitor binding. As described for numerous FabI orthologs and other SDR proteins, the substrate-binding loop (SBL, 194–204) is disordered or rearranged in our apo structures (Grimm et al, 2000; Tipparaju et al, 2008). In contrast to other FabI structures, however, the saFabI structures reveal flexibility of a second substrate-binding loop (SBL-2, 94–108) as well as the active site loop (ASL, 147–157).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…All residues interacting with the diphenyl ether inhibitors are located in three distinct regions (Figure 3), which exhibit substantial flexibility prior to cofactor and inhibitor binding. As described for numerous FabI orthologs and other SDR proteins, the substrate-binding loop (SBL, 194–204) is disordered or rearranged in our apo structures (Grimm et al, 2000; Tipparaju et al, 2008). In contrast to other FabI structures, however, the saFabI structures reveal flexibility of a second substrate-binding loop (SBL-2, 94–108) as well as the active site loop (ASL, 147–157).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In our efforts to discover direct and effective inhibitors of the bacterial and parasitic enoyl-acyl reductases, we designed and synthesized a broad range of TRC analogs. These analogs were previously evaluated for biological activity against Bacillus anthracis [39] and Toxoplasma gondii . [40, 41] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Because of this, the diphenyl ether scaffold has received considerable attention in the antibacterial drug discovery arena. 2127 Unfortunately, the diphenyl scaffold has significant disadvantages, including high serum binding and metabolic inactivation through glucuronidation and sulfation. The remaining scaffolds mentioned above also have significant hurdles which have limited their clinical utility to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%