2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and syntheses of hybrid zeolitic imidazolate frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is challenging to liquefy metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) because these materials typically decompose upon heating, even in an inert atmosphere, before they melt. However, the liquid state of MOFs is of highest interest, as it allows molding and shaping of these functional porous materials and the generation of MOF glasses by quenching the MOF melt below its glass transition temperature ( T g ). , MOF glasses have been classified as the 4th generation of MOFs as they possess the potential to address some of the key challenges in materials development for applications in gas separation, solid electrolytes, battery materials, and many more. However, out of the enormous number of crystalline MOF structures reported so far, only a very few derivatives have been shown to melt and form a porous glass after melt-quenching. Among these are some derivatives of the subfamily of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs). ,, ZIFs typically are crystalline materials constructed from M 2+ cations (e.g., Zn 2+ or Co 2+ ), which are tetrahedrally coordinated by imidazolate-type linkers, forming network topologies similar to zeolites and silicates. The rather high thermal stability of some ZIFs, predominantly a consequence of the relatively high thermal stability of imidazolate-type linkers, is a key feature for accessing their liquid and glassy states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging to liquefy metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) because these materials typically decompose upon heating, even in an inert atmosphere, before they melt. However, the liquid state of MOFs is of highest interest, as it allows molding and shaping of these functional porous materials and the generation of MOF glasses by quenching the MOF melt below its glass transition temperature ( T g ). , MOF glasses have been classified as the 4th generation of MOFs as they possess the potential to address some of the key challenges in materials development for applications in gas separation, solid electrolytes, battery materials, and many more. However, out of the enormous number of crystalline MOF structures reported so far, only a very few derivatives have been shown to melt and form a porous glass after melt-quenching. Among these are some derivatives of the subfamily of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs). ,, ZIFs typically are crystalline materials constructed from M 2+ cations (e.g., Zn 2+ or Co 2+ ), which are tetrahedrally coordinated by imidazolate-type linkers, forming network topologies similar to zeolites and silicates. The rather high thermal stability of some ZIFs, predominantly a consequence of the relatively high thermal stability of imidazolate-type linkers, is a key feature for accessing their liquid and glassy states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordination polymers, including metal-organic frameworks, are a class of porous crystalline materials formed by inorganic metal ions or clusters and functionadjustable organic ligands through directed selfassembly. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The peculiarities of inorganic-organic, crystalline, porous, structural tunable, and functionadjustable properties for CPs make them excellent candidates for applications including gas storage and separation and magnetic, electrochemical, catalysis, biomedicine, and chemical sensing properties. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Luminescent TM-CPs have attracted increasing attention for sensing environmental pollutants owing to their superior performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boron imidazolate frameworks (BIFs) could be considered as expanded structural analogs of zeolite-like MOFs (Figure a), by simulating the structural characteristics of inorganic zeolite. Zeolite networks are composed of TO 4 tetrahedral units (with T = Si, Al) sharing oxygen corners, with an average T-O-T bond angle of ∼145 deg. , As for BIFs, we replaced the O atoms in the inorganic zeolite structure with the imidazole ligand and replaced the T nodes with tetrahedral metals/clusters (Tu m+ ) and B 3+ , constructing the AlPO 4 -like zeolitic topology (Figure b) . BIFs are distinct from the zeolite imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), which are constructed by linking tetrahedral divalent cations (M 2+ = Zn 2+ or Co 2+ ) with negative imidazolate ligands (im) − . BIFs can be synthesized in a two-step synthetic strategy utilizing presynthesized four-connected tetrahedral B­(im) 4 – ligands or three-connected tripodal BH­(im) 3 – ligands to fix the B 3+ on one side of imidazolate ring (Figure c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 As for BIFs, we replaced the O atoms in the inorganic zeolite structure with the imidazole ligand and replaced the T nodes with tetrahedral metals/ clusters (Tu m+ ) and B 3+ , constructing the AlPO 4 -like zeolitic topology (Figure 1b). 3 BIFs are distinct from the zeolite imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), which are constructed by linking tetrahedral divalent cations (M 2+ = Zn 2+ or Co 2+ ) with negative imidazolate ligands (im) − . 4−6 BIFs can be synthesized in a two-step synthetic strategy utilizing presynthesized fourconnected tetrahedral B(im) 4 − ligands or three-connected tripodal BH(im) 3 − ligands to fix the B 3+ on one side of imidazolate ring (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%