2008
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/50/11/115001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and simulation of extremum-seeking open-loop optimal control of current profile in the DIII-D tokamak

Abstract: In a magnetic fusion reactor, the achievement of a certain type of plasma current profiles, which are compatible with magnetohydrodynamic stability at high plasma pressure, is key to enable high fusion gain and non-inductive sustainment of the plasma current for steady-state operation. The approach taken toward establishing such plasma current profiles at the DIII-D tokamak is to create the desired profile during the plasma current ramp-up and early flattop phases. The evolution in time of the current profile … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simplified distributed parameter system models have been studied in [18] and [27] toward current profile control at DIII-D and Tore Supra, respectively. In order to achieve an optimal current evolution in the plasma discharges of the ramp-up phase, various dynamic optimization techniques are applied to obtain numerical solutions in an open loop fashion, such as [7], [8], [19], [28]. For online implementations of optimized actuation commands, feedback strategies (e.g., [5,6,20,29]) are necessary to attenuate external perturbations and system uncertainties.…”
Section: Magnetohydrodynamic Equilibrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simplified distributed parameter system models have been studied in [18] and [27] toward current profile control at DIII-D and Tore Supra, respectively. In order to achieve an optimal current evolution in the plasma discharges of the ramp-up phase, various dynamic optimization techniques are applied to obtain numerical solutions in an open loop fashion, such as [7], [8], [19], [28]. For online implementations of optimized actuation commands, feedback strategies (e.g., [5,6,20,29]) are necessary to attenuate external perturbations and system uncertainties.…”
Section: Magnetohydrodynamic Equilibrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this example, the functions D(ρ), ϑ 1 (ρ), and ϑ 2 (ρ) are constructed using experimental data from the DIII-D tokamak in San Diego, California; see and (53)- (54). We considered two target profiles ω d (ρ) in our simulations: the first target profile is generated using the experimental input data in [28]; the second target profile is generated using the experimental output flux data in [19] (see Figure 20(a) in [19]). …”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will be particularly crucial for large experiments like ITER where disruptions can have serious consequences. Taking this approach one step further, one can also optimize future actuator inputs by iteratively predicting the plasma state in a model-predictive control scheme as proposed by [16], [17].…”
Section: Tokamakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A type of feedback controller, more appropriate for real-time implementation than the hillclimbing numerical algorithm mentioned earlier, is the so-called extremum seeking controller. This is a type of nonlinear adaptive controller which has been used in other applications in the magnetic confinement fusion community: control of the mirror angle for maximum first-pass X3 absorption on TCV [29], control of the sawtooth period by changing the EC deposition location on TCV [30], optimization of Lower Hybrid wave absporption on the FTU tokamak [31], [32], and for simulation studies of optimal plasma profile control on DIII-D [33]. Its attractiveness stems from the relative simplicity of the feedback scheme and the well-established analysis and design methods.…”
Section: Feedback Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%