2011 IEEE International Conference on RFID-Technologies and Applications 2011
DOI: 10.1109/rfid-ta.2011.6068623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and reliability evaluation of passive HF RFID systems in metal environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On each of the four boards, the tags were placed at different orientations relative to the antenna. The frame was made to hold the boards horizontally at seven heights: 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 cm. Because the presence of metal and water in the close neighbourhood of an RFID antenna or tag has negative effects on the performance and range, the frame was made entirely out of dry wood and glue (Ciudad et al, 2010;D'hoe et al, 2011).…”
Section: Test Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On each of the four boards, the tags were placed at different orientations relative to the antenna. The frame was made to hold the boards horizontally at seven heights: 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 cm. Because the presence of metal and water in the close neighbourhood of an RFID antenna or tag has negative effects on the performance and range, the frame was made entirely out of dry wood and glue (Ciudad et al, 2010;D'hoe et al, 2011).…”
Section: Test Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of a HF RFID system depends on numerous factors: the operating frequency, the type of tags used, the type of reader used, the size of tags and antenna, environmental influences, etc. (Finkenzeller, 2010;D'hoe et al, 2011). The theoretical range of an RFID system as measured by the manufacturer (often in optimal circumstances) can differ substantially from the achieved range in a real-life situation (Ciudad et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%