2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and preliminary evaluation of two tool support arm exoskeletons with gravity compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, gas springs can be compressed smoothly compared with coil springs. Due to their smoothness, they are highly adaptable to ergonomics [24] and have been widely used in worker assistance [25], [26].…”
Section: Assistance Requirements and Simulation Of Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, gas springs can be compressed smoothly compared with coil springs. Due to their smoothness, they are highly adaptable to ergonomics [24] and have been widely used in worker assistance [25], [26].…”
Section: Assistance Requirements and Simulation Of Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of the exoskeleton (4.0 kg) was added to the weight of the human model's shin and thigh. In this simulation, damping elements of the springs were not taken into account for simplicity [26], [27]. The Euler-Lagrange formalism for the human-brace model is as follows:…”
Section: Assistance Requirements and Simulation Of Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology is expansively applied to numerous fields. For example, gravity balancer is used on many tools for surgery [4] or industry [5] to carry the weight of the hand tools and to improve stability during processing, thereby reducing worker injuries and improving productivity. For some automatic robotic arm [6][7][8], springs are used to share the heavy weight, which reduce the load on the driving system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the construction of these devices requires incorporating gravity compensation units that consider the arm's range of motion, leading to a significant increase in device size. A device proposed in [33] adopts a different approach by providing load assistance at the end of the arm while positioning the gravity compensation unit on the user's back. However, this device presents a challenge in that the force-transmitting pantograph structure is aligned with the arm, potentially limiting arm movement or causing interference during operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%