2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2012.6225111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and performance of nubbed fluidizing jamming grippers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These mechanisms were rarely exploited for specific goals. Kapadia et al [10] coated a target sphere with water; this strengthened the seal and doubled the holding force for their latex balloon membrane. Amend et al [11] chose target objects with surface textures too coarse to permit seals.…”
Section: Grasp Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These mechanisms were rarely exploited for specific goals. Kapadia et al [10] coated a target sphere with water; this strengthened the seal and doubled the holding force for their latex balloon membrane. Amend et al [11] chose target objects with surface textures too coarse to permit seals.…”
Section: Grasp Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamming pressure is the most commonly modified metric across all tests (likely due to most researchers using pneumatic actuation, which allows for simple pressure variation). Numerous studies [7,10,21,22,25,31] showed the holding force, or maximum held weight, increasing alongside actuation pressure, from 0 to 450 kPa, across diverse grain, membrane and actuation compositions. Kapadia et al [10] found that the holding force was independent of ambient pressure across two orders of magnitude, and tests at various ambient pressures showed the holding force was more sensitive to increases in actuation pressure between 30 and 85 kPa than 85 and 450 kPa.…”
Section: Grasp Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides delicacy and accuracy, adaptability of gripper geometry to the contact surface, and its mechanical compliance are important assets that bring high flexibility and dexterity for handling objects of different shape and stiffness, respectively. Numerous gripper technologies have been developed, from the most dexterous multi-finger robotic hands [1], two-finger grippers [2], conformable soft hands [3,4], adhesion-based soft grippers [5] and universal jamming grippers [6,7] to industrial vacuum suction grippers [8]. Though employing multi-degrees-of-freedom robotic fingers requires meticulous control of configuration and contact forces [9,10], jamming grippers have limitations in handling flat or soft objects, and adhesion-based gecko grippers necessitate sophisticated cleanroom microfiber fabrication using lithography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the robotic hands without complicated control were reported. The universal robotic gripper based on the jamming granular material can hold a lot of object, such as bolt, glass, coil spring, and so on [1][2][3]. However, this hand is difficult to pick up a thin object such as paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%