2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36124-3_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Performance of a Media Gateway Trader

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common way to model multimedia applications is to represent media transport and processing by means of flow graphs, where the nodes represent media processing modules and the edges represent media flows. Such an approach has been taken in the Java media framework (JMF) [Sun Microsystems 1999], the Infopipe project [Black et al 2002], the MediaMesh architecture [Amini et al 2000], media gateway systems [Ooi and van Renesse 2001;Rafaelsen and Eliassen 2002], and the Parallel software-only video effects processing system (PSVP) [Mayer-Patel and Rowe 1998;1999a;1999b]. The graph building processes in both JMF and MediaMesh do not take into account more than one computer.…”
Section: Media Streaming and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common way to model multimedia applications is to represent media transport and processing by means of flow graphs, where the nodes represent media processing modules and the edges represent media flows. Such an approach has been taken in the Java media framework (JMF) [Sun Microsystems 1999], the Infopipe project [Black et al 2002], the MediaMesh architecture [Amini et al 2000], media gateway systems [Ooi and van Renesse 2001;Rafaelsen and Eliassen 2002], and the Parallel software-only video effects processing system (PSVP) [Mayer-Patel and Rowe 1998;1999a;1999b]. The graph building processes in both JMF and MediaMesh do not take into account more than one computer.…”
Section: Media Streaming and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%