2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-022-02272-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Performance Assessment of Graded Channel Gate-All-Around Silicon Nanowire FET for Biosensing Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens because as the dielectric constant increases in the cavity areas, the vertical capacitance between the gate and the channel increases, leading to effective gate capacitance enhancement, boosting gate control over the channel, which results in a reduction in channel surface potential. 61,62 Figure 2b demonstrates the channel surface potential for various biomolecule's charge concentrations, which are classified into three categories: uncharged biomolecules (neutral, K = 12), positively charged biomolecules (1 × 10 11 , 5 × 10 11 , and 1 × 10 12 cm −2 ), and negatively charged biomolecules (−1 × 10 11 , −5 × 10 11 , and −1 × 10 12 cm −2 ). When negatively charged biomolecules are injected into the nanocavity, the minima of surface potential (Ѱ c ) lowers, but (+)vely charged biomolecules raise the minima of surface potential (Ѱ c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens because as the dielectric constant increases in the cavity areas, the vertical capacitance between the gate and the channel increases, leading to effective gate capacitance enhancement, boosting gate control over the channel, which results in a reduction in channel surface potential. 61,62 Figure 2b demonstrates the channel surface potential for various biomolecule's charge concentrations, which are classified into three categories: uncharged biomolecules (neutral, K = 12), positively charged biomolecules (1 × 10 11 , 5 × 10 11 , and 1 × 10 12 cm −2 ), and negatively charged biomolecules (−1 × 10 11 , −5 × 10 11 , and −1 × 10 12 cm −2 ). When negatively charged biomolecules are injected into the nanocavity, the minima of surface potential (Ѱ c ) lowers, but (+)vely charged biomolecules raise the minima of surface potential (Ѱ c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of biomolecules alters the dielectric constant and capacitance of the gate, thereby inducing a significant change in the threshold voltage and drain current. To enhance the sensitivity of the biosensor, various dielectric modulated biosensors such as Impact Ionization MOSFET [5,6], Tunnel FET [7][8][9][10], multi gate FET [11][12][13][14], Junctionless FET [15][16][17][18][19], and high electron mobility transistors [20,21] have been introduced, each with distinct current transport mechanisms. In diverse configurations, a range of parameters are taken into account to evaluate the responsiveness of the biosensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The study shows that biosensors have less short-Channel effects and very high doping profiles. The decrease in SCEs can be done by using multiple gates, GAA, 32 FinFET and the issue of doping can be resolved by junction less FET (JLFET). 33,34 JLFET device is fabricated in the paper 35 and exhibits superior electrical properties when contrasted with the conventional MOSFET.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%