2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6859156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and passivity-based stability analysis of a PI current-mode controller for dc/dc boost converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, in order to come back into the forced original system we construct the composite Lyapunov function [20] consisting of both the storage function H , obtained from the passivity analysis, and the Lyapunov function 2 V resulting from the linear subsystem stability. Therefore, we introduce, for the forced closed-loop system (6), the following positive definite Lyapunov function…”
Section: B Stability Analysis Of the Closed-loop Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, in order to come back into the forced original system we construct the composite Lyapunov function [20] consisting of both the storage function H , obtained from the passivity analysis, and the Lyapunov function 2 V resulting from the linear subsystem stability. Therefore, we introduce, for the forced closed-loop system (6), the following positive definite Lyapunov function…”
Section: B Stability Analysis Of the Closed-loop Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as explained in [21], the presence of the non-minimum phase propitiated by the Right Half Plane Zero (RHPZ) in its transfer function, makes it a more challenging topology compared to buck converters or other topologies without RHPZ for MPPTs algorithms, since the algorithms could fall into erroneous behaviors due to the characteristic behavior of non-minimum phase elements, in this case since the voltage against each duty cycle change will first go in the opposite direction to the point at which it will stabilize (as explored by the resulsts presented in [22]), causing in turn erroneous readings that may cause confusion in control systems (as further explored in [23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to this, the design of the slow outer-loop controllers can be made independently and many methods have been reported for these designs [17]. Early endeavors for particular power converter based RES controls have been presented by the authors in [18], [19], using advanced nonlinear methods as in the present paper. In other research works such that presented in [20], a rigorous stability analysis has been addressed for simple dc/dc boost converters that proves asymptotic stability under some hard constraints on the controller gain selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%