2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3032535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Parameter Optimization of Disc Type Cutting Device for Castor Stem

Abstract: To increase the cutting efficiency for castor stem, the castor harvester cutting device was developed. The structure of the disc cutting device was designed. Cutting blade angle, sufficient working and minor cutting edge lengths were determined, which were 20°, 73 mm and 19.8 mm, respectively. The finite element model of disc cutter for castor stem was established. The incision volume was selected as the cutting performance evaluation index. The cutting process of the cutter was simulated. The results show tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main parts of the machine include a cutter disc, blade, bearing end cover, cutter shaft, fixed sleeve, bearing, shaft end ring, etc. (Hou et al, 2020). The bearings are embedded in the bushings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main parts of the machine include a cutter disc, blade, bearing end cover, cutter shaft, fixed sleeve, bearing, shaft end ring, etc. (Hou et al, 2020). The bearings are embedded in the bushings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In related cutting tests for rotary cutting, Johnson et al [29] and Mathanker et al [30] used the same test bench to study the cutting energy of miscanthus and energycane stems under different oblique angles, cutting speeds and stem diameters. Gao et al [28] and Allameh et al [31] toke cutting speed, wedge angle and slip cutting angle as experimental factors to obtain the minimum unsupported cutting power consumption. Hou et al [32] obtained the optimal blade parameters (blade angle 14.06°, slip angle 19.93° and cutter head inclination angle 10.54°) through finite element model and response surface analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al, 2004;Hemmatian et al, 2012;Muzamil et al, 2016;Oka et al, 2014;Yore et al, 2002;Zareiforoush et al, 2010). Furthermore, operational parameters of the cutting blade like bevel angle, blade orientation, and cutting speed have been shown to be vital in energy efficient crop cutting performance (Allameh & Alizadeh, 2016;Arzola & García, 2015;Dauda et al, 2015;Eliçin et al, 2019;Ghaffari et al, 2020;Hou et al, 2020;Mathanker et al, 2015;Maughan et al, 2014;Modak & Raheman, 2022;Nuţu et al, 2012;Sushilendra et al, 2016;Y. Wang et al, 2020;C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies stated the cutting location (node/internode) and number of stems (crop density) are also key factors in determining the optimal cutting force and energy requirements during harvesting (Chandio et al., 2013; Y. Chen et al., 2004; Hemmatian et al., 2012; Muzamil et al., 2016; Oka et al., 2014; Yore et al., 2002; Zareiforoush et al., 2010). Furthermore, operational parameters of the cutting blade like bevel angle, blade orientation, and cutting speed have been shown to be vital in energy efficient crop cutting performance (Allameh & Alizadeh, 2016; Arzola & García, 2015; Dauda et al., 2015; Eliçin et al., 2019; Ghaffari et al., 2020; Hou et al., 2020; Mathanker et al., 2015; Maughan et al., 2014; Modak & Raheman, 2022; Nuţu et al., 2012; Sushilendra et al., 2016; Y. Wang et al., 2020; C. Zhang et al., 2019). Using the proper blade parameters also reduces the energy consumption during crop stem cutting (J. N. Chen et al., 2018; Ding et al., 2015; Jyoti et al., 2021; Koloor & Kiani, 2007; O'dogherty & Gale, 1991a; O'dogherty & Gale, 1991b; Sahoo & Raheman, 2020; Tabatabaee‐Koloor et al., 2004; Tabatabaee‐Koloor, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%