2018
DOI: 10.1002/sim.8000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and other methodological considerations for the construction of human fetal and neonatal size and growth charts

Abstract: This paper discusses the features of study design and methodological considerations for constructing reference centile charts for attained size, growth, and velocity charts with a focus on human growth charts used during pregnancy. Recent systematic reviews of pregnancy dating, fetal size, and newborn size charts showed that many studies aimed at constructing charts are still conducted poorly. Important design features such as inclusion and exclusion criteria, ultrasound quality control measures, sample size d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first two special issue papers by Ohuma and Altman address the question of how to best construct age‐ and gender‐adjusted reference growth charts. Such charts are the basis through which parents might learn from the paediatrician that their child is, for example, in the 95% for length (or height for older children) and 90% for weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first two special issue papers by Ohuma and Altman address the question of how to best construct age‐ and gender‐adjusted reference growth charts. Such charts are the basis through which parents might learn from the paediatrician that their child is, for example, in the 95% for length (or height for older children) and 90% for weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustration, they use data from the INTERGROWTH‐21 project, which also includes prenatal head circumference data. The second paper by Ohuma and Altman draws from their experience with the INTERGROWTH‐21 study to offer design guidelines. The third and fourth papers in the special issue address the question of how to model repeated standardised growth measures in a longitudinal setting .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professor Douglas Altman's involvement in the Intergrowth-21 st project motivated him to revisit the methodology and study design of growth references and standards (115). Along with Ohuma, the paper discusses many of the recommendations outlined in Altman's previous papers on this subject (97,98) but in more depth.…”
Section: Study Design For Reference Centile Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors criticise population specific reference intervals as being "fallacious" due to variations in fetal growth across regions being dictated by their geographical location and that these artificial boundaries nullify within population heterogeneity (114). However, both methodologies are valid but use different approaches to devise different reference charts (115).…”
Section: Study Design For Reference Centile Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation