2020
DOI: 10.1142/s2010132520500157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Modeling for the Performance Enhancement of Solar Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) Collectors

Abstract: In this paper, a simulation of a photovoltaic–thermal (PV/T) hybrid solar system with longitudinal fins absorbers was developed to determine optimal geometry parameters for conventional design of this system. In this case, we used a dynamic model based on the principle of the airflow rate to determine the optimum design of the PV/T system for each airflow velocity. In this regard, the influences of the geometric parameters (number, height) on the collector performance of each model with different flow velociti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the water flow rate is inversely proportional to the temperature of the PV cell because the feed temperature is directly responsible of cooling the PV/T cells. These results agree well with those published by Sahlaoui et al 6 Figure 4 also represents the variation of instantaneous electrical efficiency as function of the cooling flow rate. The figure shows that, for a flow rate equal to 0.05 kg/s, the electrical efficiency decreases from the nominal efficiency 14.17% throughout the day until reaching 12.62% at 15 h. By increasing the water flow rate, the efficiency increases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the water flow rate is inversely proportional to the temperature of the PV cell because the feed temperature is directly responsible of cooling the PV/T cells. These results agree well with those published by Sahlaoui et al 6 Figure 4 also represents the variation of instantaneous electrical efficiency as function of the cooling flow rate. The figure shows that, for a flow rate equal to 0.05 kg/s, the electrical efficiency decreases from the nominal efficiency 14.17% throughout the day until reaching 12.62% at 15 h. By increasing the water flow rate, the efficiency increases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The thermal collector and the PV efficiencies are 52% and 13%, respectively. In fact each of water, 3 nanofluid, 4 or air 5,6 can be as coolant in PV/T collectors. Ma 7 evaluated the performances of glazed and unglazed PV/T systems at the same operating conditions: solar radiation G = 1000 W/m 2 , ambient temperature T a = 25°C, the collector input temperature T in = 25°C, a wind velocity V = 2 m/s, and a mass flow rate of m = 0.04 kg/s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The price of electricity and natural gas fluctuates from UDS$0.078/kWh to UDS$0.112/kWh, while the price of gas varies from UDS$0.089/kWh to UDS$0.120/kWh (STEG: Tunisian Company of Electricity and Gas, 2020). R0.33embadbreak=i=1nRy0.33emfalse(1+rn1false)r1+rn$$\begin{equation}R\ = \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^n {R}_y\ \frac{{({{\left( {1 + r} \right)}}^n - 1)}}{{r{{\left( {1 + r} \right)}}^n}}\end{equation}$$ Rybadbreak=Eel0.33em.Priceelgoodbreak+Ethηth,bPricefuel$$\begin{equation}{R}_y = {E}_{el}\ .Pric{e}_{el} + \frac{{{E}_{th}}}{{{\eta }_{th,b}}}Pric{e}_{fuel}\end{equation}$$where r is the financing rate, which is set at 3% and n is the life cycle, which is assumed to be 20 years as defined by [34, 35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, thermodynamically, kWh of electricity cannot be directly compared to kWh of heat because their values are not the same [33]. As a result, they believe it is more accurate to compare the two quantities in terms of initial energy by introducing a new efficiency parameter known as initial energy saving efficiency Cpv${C}_{pv}$ [33, 35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation