2007
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2006.888475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Measurement of Self-Matched Dual-Frequency Coplanar Waveguide-Fed-Slot Antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 5, shows that the H co-plane is oval in shape while the E co-plane is bidirectional, the typical pattern of a non-grounded FSA [5]. The gain and the 3 dB BW are approximately 4.8 dBi and 60 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 5, shows that the H co-plane is oval in shape while the E co-plane is bidirectional, the typical pattern of a non-grounded FSA [5]. The gain and the 3 dB BW are approximately 4.8 dBi and 60 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1, was designed to operate at 5 GHz and utilizes an internal self-matching technique, the antenna slot widths are designed to match the antenna to the feed line without external matching networks [5]. The antenna slot dimensions are: and mm.…”
Section: A Antenna Design and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of these criteria is presented in Table 4 that includes the dominant four main aspects indicated. These factors (criteria) and their subcriteria were introduced in the AHP model for this study after wide literature review [1][2][3][4][5] and [9][10][11]. Then, data collection aimed at evaluating the comparability of the selected criteria was achieved by means of a questionnaire that was sent out to some twenty carefully selected experts in antenna worldwide, most of whom are from academic institutions and a few professionals.…”
Section: The Ahp Model For This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mobile phones, there are several commonly used types of antennas (alternatives) that all share several distinguishing features such as; small weight, small size and ability to be fit inside the mobile phone housing, high gain of up to 8 dBi, and very good impedance matching over the operating band. The antennas that possess the above features, and are therefore commonly used inside mobile phones operating in the GSM band, include the monopole antenna [4], the planar inverted F-antenna (PIFA) [5], the microstrip patch antenna [6], the loop chip antenna [7], and the printed slot antenna [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coplanar waveguide (CPW)-fed slot antenna has become a promising candidate due to its uniplanar structure, wide bandwidth, and easy integration with RF front-end circuitry. To our knowledge, however, only a few slot antenna elements using CPW as feed lines have been proposed to possess dual-or multi-frequency capabilities [1]- [8]. Slot rings and slot loops are the fundamental structures commonly used in [3]- [6], but they inherently produce high cross-polarized radiations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%